PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Oral allergy treatment with dust mites for dogs with skin allergies

By Marsella, Rosanna·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2010·University of Florida, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Tolerability and clinical efficacy of oral immunotherapy with house dust mites in a model of canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 13 beagle dogs with atopic dermatitis (a chronic skin condition) were given daily oral doses of house dust mites to see if it would help their symptoms. The treatment lasted for 7 months, but unfortunately, the dogs did not show any significant improvement in their skin condition or allergen-specific IgE levels, which are related to allergic reactions. The dogs tolerated the treatment well without any side effects. This study suggests that while oral immunotherapy is safe, it may not be effective for improving skin issues in dogs with atopic dermatitis.

People also search for: dog skin allergies treatment · beagle atopic dermatitis · house dust mite allergy in dogs

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, life-long disease. In humans, immunotherapy (IT) is the only treatment that can alter the course of AD. Oral IT is appealing owing to the ease of administration and the potential for increased compliance. The purposes of this study were to investigate the tolerability, clinical efficacy and effects on allergen-specific IgE of oral IT using a canine AD model. Thirteen atopic beagles sensitized to house dust mites (HDMs) were randomly divided into two groups. One group received daily oral doses of HDMs while the other group received vehicle only for 7 months. The investigator evaluating the dogs was blinded to the allocation of treatments. Prior to and after 2 and 7 months of IT, dogs were challenged daily with HDMs for 3 days concurrently, and clinical signs were scored using a modified Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI). Prior to and at completion of oral IT, serum was collected for measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Oral IT was well tolerated, and no adverse effects were noted. Analysis of variance showed no significant effect of time, group and group × time interaction for CADESI scores. In addition, there were no significant differences in allergen-specific IgE levels. In conclusion, it appears that oral administration of HDMs is well tolerated in these atopic beagles but that this protocol was not sufficient to induce clinical improvement. Further, longer-term studies will be necessary to explore the potential of oral IT in veterinary medicine.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20492623/