PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Skin or mouth flaps in dogs often have problems after radiation

By Séguin, Bernard et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2005·Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences and Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Tolerance of cutaneous or mucosal flaps placed into a radiation therapy field in dogs.

Species:
dog
Skin & coatDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 26 dogs undergoing radiation therapy for tumors had skin or mucosal flaps placed as part of their treatment. Most of the dogs (77%) experienced complications like infections or healing issues, and some needed additional procedures. However, those who had the flaps as part of their planned treatment generally fared better than those who needed flaps due to complications. Postoperative radiation therapy helped reduce the severity of these complications. Overall, the use of flaps in dogs receiving radiation therapy was successful in 85% of cases, despite the challenges.

People also search for: dog skin flap surgery complications · radiation therapy for dog tumors · dog tumor treatment options

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcome and factors affecting cutaneous or mucosal flaps in dogs treated with radiation therapy (RT). STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal clinical study. ANIMALS: Twenty-six client-owned dogs. METHODS: Dogs entered in the study had a flapping procedure and RT as part of their treatment. The sequence of flapping and RT included: (1) planned preoperative RT, (2) postoperative RT, and (3) flapping as a salvage procedure for management of complications or local tumor recurrence after RT. Flap complications were defined as necrosis, local infection, dehiscence, and ulceration. The risk and severity of flap complication were analyzed independently. RESULTS: Twenty (77%) dogs had a complication; 6 dogs required an additional flapping procedure; and 4 dogs had an unresolved complication. Flapping procedures performed to correct a complication, or failure of RT, had a significantly greater risk for complication; however, postoperative RT decreased the severity of complication. A dose per fraction of 4 Gy compared with 3 Gy was prognostic for increased severity of complications, whereas the head and neck location was prognostic for decreased severity of complication. CONCLUSIONS: Although morbidity was substantial, cutaneous or mucosal flaps were used successfully in an RT field in 85% of the dogs. Flaps that were part of the planned therapy as opposed to those used to correct a complication or failure of RT had a better clinical outcome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cutaneous or mucosal flaps can be part of the treatment of dogs with tumor when adjuvant or neoadjuvant RT is to be used.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115077/