PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Rectal cancer surgery outcomes in 11 dogs with colorectal carcinoma

By Morello, Emanuela et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2008·School of Veterinary Medicine, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Transanal pull-through rectal amputation for treatment of colorectal carcinoma in 11 dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 11 dogs with colorectal cancer underwent a surgical procedure called transanal rectal pull-through amputation to remove their tumors. While most dogs recovered well, some experienced complications like rectal bleeding and temporary difficulty with bowel movements. Two dogs that had a more extensive surgery unfortunately passed away shortly after. However, the remaining dogs had a good chance of long-term survival, with an average survival time of about 44 months. This surgery can be effective for treating colorectal tumors, but the simpler transanal approach is generally safer than the combined method.

People also search for: dog colorectal cancer treatment · dog rectal surgery recovery · symptoms of dog rectal bleeding

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcome after transanal rectal pull-through amputation of single colorectal adenocarcinoma and in situ carcinoma (Tis) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: Dogs (n=11) with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Full-thickness colorectal amputation by either simple transanal (7 dogs) or combined abdominal-transanal (4) pull-through technique. RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma (8) and Tis (2) were removed with 3-6 cm of grossly normal tissue, cranial and caudal to the tumor, or in 1 Tis with 2 cm grossly normal tissue, cranial and caudal. Two dogs that had a combined abdominal-transanal approach died within 4 days. In the other dogs, postoperative complications included short-term tenesmus (6 dogs), rectal bleeding (11), rectal stricture (3), and long-term fecal incontinence (1). Postoperative recurrence and metastatic rates for adenocarcinoma were 18.2% and 0%, respectively. Median disease-free interval and survival time were not reached. Mean disease-free and overall survival times were 44.3 and 44.6 months (range, 0-75 months), respectively. CONCLUSION: En bloc excision of colorectal Tis and adenocarcinoma may be followed by a long survival. Complications of the transanal approach are usually moderate and self-limiting, but complications are more common and severe when more extensive resections are performed through a combined abdominal-transanal approach. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Transanal rectal pull-through amputation is suitable for en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasia. A combined abdominal-transanal approach should be reserved for tumors extending from the mid-cranial region of the rectum to the descending colon.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18986308/