PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Cat urinary blockage surgery using pelvic bone removal technique

By Bernarde, A & Viguier, E·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2004·Small Animal Surgical Department, France·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Transpelvic urethrostomy in 11 cats using an ischial ostectomy.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

Eleven male cats suffering from severe urinary blockages underwent a surgical procedure called transpelvic urethrostomy (TPU) to create a new way for urine to exit the body. This surgery was successful for all the cats, and they did not experience major complications. While one cat had temporary urinary incontinence that resolved in about four weeks, the rest showed no signs of stricture or further obstruction for up to 42 months after the surgery. TPU proved to be an effective option for relieving urinary tract issues in cats.

People also search for: cat urinary blockage treatment · male cat urinary incontinence · transpelvic urethrostomy for cats

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and long-term outcome of a modified subpubic urethrostomy technique termed transpelvic urethrostomy (TPU) in cats. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. ANIMALS: Eleven male cats with obstructive lower urinary tract disease that could not be relieved, and requiring a surgical urinary diversion, were selected for TPU. METHODS: With the cat in dorsal recumbency, the penis was exposed and the ventral pelvis was denuded by median adductor muscle elevation. An approximately 12 mm x 15 mm area of ischium was removed. The pelvic urethra, 8-20 mm cranial to the bulbourethral glands, was incised longitudinally and sutured to the skin to create a urethrostomy. RESULTS: All cats were neutered males (2-9 years); none were uremic or hyperkalemic at admission. Urine was cultured if there was leukocyturia, nitrituria, and/or bacteriua. Bacteria were isolated from 2 specimens. A patent urethrostomy was created in all cats without operative complications. Except for 1 cat without associated clinical signs, stricture was not evident between 9 and 42 months after urethrostomy. One cat had postoperative urinary incontinence (UI) that resolved within 4 weeks. Two cats each had 1 episode of idiopathic lower urinary tract disease after 6-month follow-up; both responded to medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: TPU was used as a successful urinary diversion procedure relieving signs of urinary tract obstruction and preventing further obstruction, with few complications. The incidence of UI after TPU remains minimal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TPU should be considered as a salvage urinary diversion procedure in cats (as an alternative to prepubic and subpubic techniques). TPU may also be considered as a possible primary urinary diversion solution (an alternative to perineal urethrostomy) for obstructive lower urinary tract disease in cats.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15104631/