Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Hearing improved in 11-year-old Beagles after middle ear implant
By Ter Haar, G et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2010·Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Netherlands·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Treatment of age-related hearing loss in dogs with the vibrant soundbridge middle ear implant: short-term results in 3 dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Three Beagle dogs, each around 11 years old, were treated for age-related hearing loss (ARHL) using a special middle ear implant called the Vibrant Soundbridge. After the surgery, the dogs showed improved hearing ability, with significant gains in sound detection at various frequencies. While two of the dogs experienced temporary facial nerve paralysis after the procedure, they recovered well overall. The study suggests that while the implants can help improve hearing, further research is needed to confirm their effectiveness in everyday communication between dogs and their owners.
People also search for: dog hearing loss treatment · Beagle age-related hearing loss · middle ear implant for dogs · how to help my dog hear better
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age-related hearing loss (ARHL), or presbycusis, is the most common form of acquired hearing loss in dogs. Middle ear implants have been used successfully in people with ARHL who cannot benefit from conventional hearing aids. HYPOTHESIS: Audibility improves in dogs with ARHL after implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) middle ear implant. ANIMALS: Three Beagle dogs with ARHL, mean age 11.1 years. METHODS: The dogs were assessed pre- and postoperatively by brainstem-evoked response audiometry (BERA), otoscopy, and computed tomography scans of the ears. A VSB middle ear implant was implanted unilaterally. Three months later the functionality of the implants was assessed by auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs), after which the dogs were euthanized for histopathological examination. RESULTS: The VSB was implanted successfully in all dogs. Recovery from surgery was uneventful, except for transient facial nerve paralysis in 2 dogs. ASSRs showed that hearing improved after activation of the implants with a mean of 20.7, 13, and 16.3 dB at 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively. The implantation procedure did not affect residual hearing (with inactive implants) as measured by BERA. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Implantation of the VSB resulted in lower ASSR thresholds, but only at the higher gain settings of the audioprocessor. As in humans, a more powerful audioprocessor is required to treat sensorineural hearing loss exceeding 20 dB in dogs. A substantial improvement in patient-owner communication will have to be demonstrated in future studies before the procedure can be recommended in clinical practice.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20337911/