PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Healing dog teeth furcation perforations with MTA, PRP, or PRF

By Tawfik, Hosam E et al.·Published in Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie·2016·Department of Endodontics·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Treatment of experimental furcation perforations with mineral trioxide aggregate, platelet rich plasma or platelet rich fibrin in dogs' teeth.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 12 dogs had teeth with furcation perforations (holes in the bone around the tooth roots) treated with either mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). The treatments aimed to see which method helped heal the teeth better. Results showed that both PRP and PRF significantly reduced bone loss and inflammation compared to MTA, especially in teeth that weren't contaminated. Overall, PRP and PRF proved to be effective options for repairing these types of dental issues in dogs, with the best results seen in non-contaminated teeth.

People also search for: dog dental treatment options · furcation perforation repair in dogs · platelet-rich plasma for dog teeth

Abstract

This work evaluates the effect of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), platelet rich plasma (PRP) or platelet rich fibrin (PRF) on healing of non-contaminated and contaminated furcation perforations. A total of 192 teeth of 12 dogs was divided into three equal groups according to evaluation period. Each group was further subdivided into MTA, PRP, PRF, negative and positive control subgroups. Each experimental subgroup was further subdivided according to perforation status into non-contaminated and contaminated subdivisions. Root canal therapy was carried out and furcation perforation was made in all teeth except in negative control subgroup. The furcation perforation was repaired immediately in subdivision (1) and after 4 weeks in subdivision (2). The change in vertical bone loss was measured by radiography. Inflammatory cell count, cemental deposition, new bone formation, bone resorption and epithelial proliferation were assessed. Both PRP and PRF demonstrated statistically significant reduction in vertical bone loss and inflammatory cell count than MTA. No significant difference was found between MTA, PRP and PRF in cemental deposition, new bone formation, bone resorption and epithelial proliferation. The non-contaminated teeth demonstrated better treatment outcomes than the contaminated teeth. In conclusion, PRP and PRF are successful treatment options for repairing of furcation perforation in both non-contaminated and contaminated teeth in dogs with superior outcomes in non contaminated teeth.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27033179/