Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Treating chronic corneal ulcers in dogs with diamond burr or combined
By Wu, Doris et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2018·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Treatment of spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects (SCCEDs) with diamond burr debridement vs combination diamond burr debridement and superficial grid keratotomy.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with chronic corneal issues, known as spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects (SCCEDs), were treated with either diamond burr debridement or a combination of diamond burr debridement and superficial grid keratotomy. Both treatments were found to be equally effective, with about 77% of dogs healing after the first treatment. The average time for healing was around 13 to 15 days, and complications were similar for both methods. This means that pet owners can feel confident that either treatment option can help their dog recover from these eye problems.
People also search for: dog eye problems treatment · SCCED in dogs · diamond burr debridement for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of diamond burr debridement (DBD) vs a combination of diamond burr debridement with superficial grid keratotomy (DBD+SGK) for the treatment of spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects (SCCEDs) in dogs. PROCEDURE: Medical records of dogs diagnosed with SCCEDs from three different institutions that received a DBD or DBD+SGK between 2003 and 2015 were reviewed. Age, breed, sex, history of a previous SCCED, procedures performed, time to healing, and complications were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-four dogs met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-two of 106 eyes (77.4%) received a DBD and healed following the first treatment (13.3 ± 4.9 days to recheck, range 2-27). Sixty-eight of 88 eyes (77.3%) received a DBD+SGK and healed following the first treatment (15.4 ± 5.0 days to recheck, range 5-45). No significant difference in healing outcome was found between the two treatments (P = 1). For SCCEDs that healed after a single treatment (n = 150), complications occurred in 13.3% (n = 20) of eyes with no difference in complications between the DBD and DBD+SGK groups (P = .86). Thirty-five of 44 eyes (80.0%) healed after the second treatment (16 ± 8.2 days from second treatment to third visit, range 5-47); nine of 44 eyes (20.0%) were not healed (12 ± 6.2 days from second treatment to third visit, range 5-25). The second treatment method did not influence healing rates (P = .64). CONCLUSIONS: DBD and DBD+SGK are equally effective treatment methods for canine SCCEDs. No differences in complication rates after one treatment were observed between DBD and DBD+SGK.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29536611/