PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Tularemia infection risk for vets from sick dogs

By Grace E Marx et al.·Published in Clinical Infectious Diseases·2024·View original on Semantic Scholar

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Tularemia From Veterinary Occupational Exposure.

Plain-English summary

A veterinarian developed a serious infection called tularemia after accidentally pricking themselves while treating a sick dog with an abscess. This infection, caused by a bacteria that can spread from animals to humans, led to hospitalization, but the vet fully recovered after receiving antibiotics and proper treatment. The study highlights that while the risk of getting tularemia in veterinary settings is low, it can happen, especially when proper safety gear isn't used. To protect themselves, veterinary staff should always wear personal protective equipment when handling sick animals and consider preventive treatment if they have high-risk exposures.

Abstract

Tularemia is a disease caused by Francisella tularensis, a highly infectious bacteria that can be transmitted to humans by direct contact with infected animals. Because of the potential for zoonotic transmission of F. tularensis, veterinary occupational risk is a concern. Here, we report on a human case of tularemia in a veterinarian after an accidental needlestick injury during abscess drainage in a sick dog. The veterinarian developed ulceroglandular tularemia requiring hospitalization but fully recovered after abscess drainage and a course of effective antibiotics. To systematically assess veterinary occupational transmission risk of F. tularensis, we conducted a survey of veterinary clinical staff after occupational exposure to animals with confirmed tularemia. We defined a high-risk exposure as direct contact to the infected animal's body fluids or potential aerosol inhalation without use of standard personal protective equipment (PPE). Survey data included information on 20 veterinary occupational exposures to animals with F. tularensis in 4 states. Veterinarians were the clinical staff most often exposed (40%), followed by veterinarian technicians and assistants (30% and 20%, respectively). Exposures to infected cats were most common (80%). Standard PPE was not used during 80% of exposures; a total of 7 exposures were categorized as high risk. Transmission of F. tularensis in the veterinary clinical setting is possible but overall risk is likely low. Veterinary clinical staff should use standard PPE and employ environmental precautions when handling sick animals to minimize risk of tularemia and other zoonotic infections; postexposure prophylaxis should be considered after high-risk exposures to animals with suspected or confirmed F. tularensis infection to prevent tularemia.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Semantic Scholar: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38294113