Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Safer needle placement for quadratus lumborum block in cats shown
By Takusagawa, Fumihiko et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2026·Seibozaka Animal Hospital, Japan·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Ultrasonographic evaluation demonstrating safer needle-organ distances in a novel quadratus lumborum block technique in cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 14 female cats undergoing spay surgery were studied to see if a new way of placing a needle for pain relief (called a quadratus lumborum block) was safer than the traditional method. The new technique resulted in fewer organs being close to the needle, especially on the right side, which suggests it may be a safer option. While both methods required careful monitoring with ultrasound to avoid nearby organs, the new approach showed better distances from the needle to these vital areas. Overall, the cats were likely to experience less risk during the procedure with this new technique.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We investigated the relationship between needle placement and adjacent organs using ultrasonography during a novel quadratus lumborum block (QLB) performed in sternal recumbency and the conventional QLB performed in lateral recumbency among cats undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: Fourteen client-owned female cats were randomly allocated to the conventional QLB group (= 7) or the novel QLB group (= 7). For the conventional QLB group, the ultrasound probe was positioned at the second lumbar vertebra, whereas for the novel QLB group, it was placed at the intertransverse space between the second and third lumbar vertebrae. Probe angle was standardized at 90° using a 180° protractor, and tilted views were obtained at 70°, 80°, 100°, and 110°. The 90° image served as the needle insertion reference. OsiriX was used to identify organs within 5 mm of the needle shaft and to measure distances from the needle shaft, entry point, and needle tip to the nearest organs on the 90° image. Distances from a hypothetical entry point projected onto the tilted images were also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with the conventional QLB group, the novel QLB group had fewer organs within 5 mm of the needle shaft on the right side. The novel QLB group also showed greater distances from the needle shaft and entry point to the nearest organs, as well as a shorter distance from the needle tip to the nearest organ. In tilted images, no between-group differences were identified except at 100° on the left side, where the novel QLB group had a longer distance. Blood vessels were the structures most frequently identified near the needle pathway. DISCUSSION: The novel QLB positioned the needle trajectory farther from vital organs, particularly on the right side, supporting its potential safety advantage. Real-time ultrasonographic visualization remains necessary because organs were still identified parallel to the trajectory or distal to the needle tip.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41669195/