PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Ultrasound vs X-rays for diagnosing dog hip dysplasia

By Inês Tomé et al.·Published in Veterinary Sciences·2025·Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal, CH·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Canine Hip Dysplasia: Comparison with FCI Radiographic Scoring System

Species:
dog
Hip dysplasiaMovement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 22 adult dogs with hip problems were evaluated for canine hip dysplasia (CHD), a condition that can cause joint pain and arthritis. The dogs underwent both traditional X-rays and ultrasound to assess their hip joints. The ultrasound showed changes in the bone and surrounding tissues earlier than X-rays, which could help in diagnosing and monitoring the condition. The study found that ultrasound measurements differed significantly between normal and dysplastic hips, suggesting it could be a useful tool for vets in managing CHD.

People also search for: dog hip dysplasia ultrasound · signs of hip problems in dogs · treatment for dog arthritis · how to diagnose canine hip dysplasia

Abstract

Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) is a common orthopedic condition characterized by joint laxity, abnormal femoral head development, and osteoarthritis. Radiography remains the gold standard in diagnosis; however, ultrasonography (US) can detect changes in bone and periarticular soft tissue earlier in CHD progression. Forty-four hips from twenty-two adult dogs of various breeds were graded according to the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) grading system, and grouped as normal (A, B) or dysplastic (C, D, E). Canine hip US evaluation, using the ventral femoral head–neck approach, included the following: capsule thickness at the femoral head index (CTFHi) and capsule thickness at the femoral head–neck index (CTFHNi), both measured in mm/body weight × 100; femoral head shape score (FHSs) and femoral head–neck transition score (FHNTs); and osteophyte score (Os). These findings were evaluated qualitatively and then converted into numerical scores. Twenty-three hips were graded on the FCI system as being normal, and twenty-one as dysplastic. Median values of the US parameters CTFHi, CTFHNi, FHSs, FHNTs, and Os were 2.02, 7.79, 1.00, 1.00, and 0.00 in the normal-hips group, and 3.11, 9.32, 3.00, 2.00, and 1.00 in the dysplastic-hips group. Significant differences were observed between most US parameters evaluated. Strong associations were found between CTFHi, FHNTs, and Os, indicating progressive bone remodeling. These findings support US usage as a potential tool for CHD diagnosis and monitoring.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13010020