Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog and cat radiation dose calculations - what you need to know
By Shin B et al.·2026·J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, United States·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Updated Computational Performance Evaluation of ICRP Mesh-type Reference Computational Phantoms Using PHITS, Geant4, MCNP6.3, and EGSnrc.
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how well different computer programs can simulate the effects of radiation using special models called mesh-type reference computational phantoms (MRCPs). These models help calculate safe radiation dose levels for both adults and children. The researchers tested several programs, including PHITS, Geant4, MCNP6.3, and EGSnrc, focusing on how quickly they start up, how much memory they use, and how fast they can perform calculations. They found that while some programs took longer to start, others were faster at calculating certain types of radiation. Overall, the findings can help users choose the best program for their needs when working with these radiation models.
Abstract
The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has adopted mesh-type reference computational phantoms (MRCPs) for the calculation of new reference dose coefficients following the forthcoming general recommendations. In the present study, the computational performance of adult and pediatric MRCPs was systematically evaluated using recently updated Monte Carlo radiation transport codes, including PHITS (version 3.31), Geant4 (version 11.01.p02), MCNP6.3, and EGSnrc (version 2025a). Performance evaluation included initialization time, memory usage, computation time, and multi-threading efficiency for photon, electron, and neutron transport under selected external exposure scenarios. Among the evaluated codes, EGSnrc exhibited the longest initialization time, approximately 8-9 times longer than PHITS. Nevertheless, the absolute time remained within a few minutes. In terms of memory usage, PHITS and EGSnrc required the least memory (<2 GB), whereas Geant4 required the largest memory (approximately 13-14 GB). For computation time, EGSnrc showed the fastest performance for photons and electrons with energies ≤10 MeV, while PHITS demonstrated the shortest computation time for neutrons. MCNP6.3 consistently exhibited longer computation times compared with the other codes. When compared with simulations using the existing ICRP voxel-type reference computational phantoms (VRCPs), PHITS and Geant4 showed comparable or shorter computation times for mesh phantoms. EGSnrc exhibited comparable or shorter computation times for pediatric mesh phantoms, whereas the opposite trend was observed for adult phantoms. In contrast, MCNP6.3 consistently showed longer computation times for the MRCPs than for the VRCPs. Despite its relatively longer absolute computation time, MCNP6.3 demonstrated the best multi-threading performance among the evaluated codes, showing near-linear scaling of computation speed with increasing number of threads. The results of this study provide practical guidance for users in selecting an optimal Monte Carlo code for dose calculations using ICRP mesh-type reference computational phantoms.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42061965