Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Urinary cortisol test has limited accuracy for diagnosing dog
By Del Baldo, Francesca et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2025·Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Urinary cortisol-to-creatinine ratio using a chemiluminescent assay has limited diagnostic accuracy for canine hypercortisolism.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected of having Cushing's disease (hypercortisolism) underwent testing using a urine test that measures cortisol levels. The study found that while the test could help identify some cases of Cushing's disease, it wasn't very reliable on its own, as it had a sensitivity of about 80% and a specificity of 71%. This means that some dogs with the disease might still test negative, and some healthy dogs might test positive. Veterinarians are advised to use this urine test alongside other tests for a more accurate diagnosis.
People also search for: dog Cushing's disease symptoms · urine test for dog cortisol levels · diagnosing Cushing's disease in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish the de novo reference interval (RI) for urinary cortisol-to-creatinine ratio (UCCR) in healthy dogs (HDs) using the currently available chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay antibody (Veterinary Cortisol; IMMULITE 2000 XPi; Siemens Healthineers) and to evaluate UCCR diagnostic performance in dogs with hypercortisolism (HC). METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Stored urine samples from dogs with HC or diseases mimicking HC (DMHC) at the time of diagnosis were selected from July 2019 through November 2022. Healthy dogs were prospectively included. The diagnostic performance of the UCCR was assessed based on receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-two dogs were included: 97 with HC, 35 with DMHC, and 40 HDs. The de novo RI for UCCR in HDs was between 3 X 10-6 (90% CI, 2.3 X 10-6 to 3.8 X 10-6) and 26 X 10-6 (90% CI, 29.7 X 10-6 to 35.0 X 10-6). The median UCCR was significantly higher in dogs with HC (70.9 X 10-6; 6.8 X 10-6 to 882.2 X 10-6) as compared to dogs with DMHC (15 X 10-6; 2.63 X 10-6 to 137.8 X 10-6) and HDs (9.1 X 10-6; 3.9 X 10-6 to 36.3 X 10-6). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for UCCR to differentiate HC dogs from dogs with DMHC was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.92). Using the upper limit of the de novo RI as the cutoff value (UCCR > 26 X 10-6), the sensitivity and the specificity for the UCCR in diagnosing HC were 80.4% (95% CI, 71.1% to 87.8%) and 71.4% (95% CI, 53.7% to 85.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using the upper limit of the de novo RI, UCCR showed modest performances not only due to low specificity but also due to a sensitivity of only 80.4%. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: UCCR should not be used alone to rule out HC in dogs, and, when the clinical suspicion for HC is present, other endocrine tests should be pursued.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40228544/