Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using bipolar vessel sealing for dog limb amputation and short-term
By Arrufat, Kelsey & Chisnell, Hope·Published in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne·2024·Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Use of a bipolar vessel-sealing device in 27 canine limb amputations.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs underwent limb amputations using a special device called a bipolar vessel-sealing device (BVSD) to help with the surgery. The study looked at 27 dogs, mostly large breeds, and found that there were no major problems during the surgery. After the operations, a few dogs developed minor issues like infections or fluid buildup at the surgery site, but overall, the use of the BVSD was safe and effective. This method could be a good option for future limb amputations in dogs.
People also search for: dog limb amputation recovery · canine surgery infection signs · bipolar vessel-sealing device for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bipolar vessel-sealing devices (BVSD) have been used for muscle transection in canine limb amputations; however, a retrospective study of their use, and particularly the short-term complications, has not yet been reported. OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of a BVSD as the main method for muscle transection in canine limb amputations and to report the incidence of short-term incisional complications following these surgeries. ANIMALS AND PROCEDURE: Medical records of dogs undergoing limb amputations using a BVSD from January 2017 to December 2018 were reviewed for demographics, preoperative findings, intraoperative complications, and short-term outcomes. Exclusion criteria included surgery and anesthesia time not recorded, or short-term postoperative follow-up data not available for review. Complications noted in the medical record up to the time of suture removal were included in the review. RESULTS: A total of 27 cases met selection criteria, including amputations of 17 forelimbs and 10 pelvic limbs. There were no intraoperative complications noted. Median duration between surgery and suture removal was 13 d (range: 4 to 23 d). Seroma formation occurred in 1 case (3.7%), whereas convalescent surgical-site infections were identified in 3 cases (11%). All complications were documented in dogs weighing > 27 kg. CONCLUSION: Use of a BVSD as the main method of muscle transection in canine limb amputations is a safe and feasible alternative to more traditional methods of limb amputation. Surgical-site infection and seroma formation were the only documented complications in the present study. The complication rate was similar to rates described previously; therefore, using a BVSD for muscle transection seems a viable alternative to traditional methods of limb amputation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given similar incisional complication rates when compared to more traditional methods of muscle transection, a BVSD may be considered for an alternative method of muscle transection in canine limb amputations.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39649744/