Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Questionnaire helps predict bleeding risk from von Willebrand disease
By Burgess, Hilary J et al.·Published in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire·2009·Department of Pathobiology, Canada·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Use of a questionnaire to predict von Willebrand disease status and characterize hemorrhagic signs in a population of dogs and evaluation of a diagnostic profile to predict risk of bleeding.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 165 dogs was evaluated for von Willebrand disease (vWD), a bleeding disorder, using a questionnaire to identify signs of bleeding and assess their vWD status. Many dogs showed low levels of a protein important for blood clotting, with oral bleeding being the most common symptom reported. While the questionnaire could help identify some dogs at risk for vWD, it wasn't reliable enough to predict bleeding risk accurately. Overall, the study found that while the questionnaire provided some useful information, it wasn't effective as a screening tool for vWD.
People also search for: dog bleeding disorder symptoms · von Willebrand disease in dogs · dog oral bleeding treatment
Abstract
The objective of this study was to use a questionnaire 1) for characterization of hemorrhagic signs; 2) to assess its value as a predictor of von Willebrand Disease (vWD) status; and 3) for evaluation of the vWD diagnostic profile [platelet function analysis using the PFA-100, Collagen binding assay (vWF:CBA), and vWF antigen ELISA (vWF:Ag)], partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and Factor VIII activity (FVIII) as predictors of hemorrhagic risk. von Willebrand factor (vWF) concentration and function was assessed for each of the 165 canine participants using the vWD diagnostic profile. Hemorrhagic signs for each dog were obtained using a standardized questionnaire. Questionnaires were scored according to a previously prepared scoring key. Of the 165 dogs in the study, 43.6% had a low vWF concentration, with only 48.6% of dogs in this group having reports of hemorrhagic signs. Oral bleeding was the most commonly reported sign. The questionnaire had a sensitivity of 48.6% and a specificity of 78.5% for the prediction of vWD status. Using the Spearman correlation coefficient, a statistical association was found between the questionnaire and the vWD diagnostic profile components. However, this could not be translated into an ability to predict hemorrhage. The questionnaire allowed characterization of hemorrhagic signs in a large population of dogs over a range of vWF:Ag concentrations, and demonstrated that the vWD diagnostic profile was unsuccessful in the prediction of hemorrhagic risk. Although the sensitivity was insufficient for a screening tool, the questionnaire did have some discriminatory power in the prediction of vWD status.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20046625/