PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How carrying different mouth weights affects retriever dogs' front

By Weber, Melissa A et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2022·Twin Cities Animal Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine Clinic, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Use of acoustic myography to evaluate forelimb muscle function in retriever dogs carrying different mouth weights.

Species:
dog
Movement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of retriever dogs was studied to see how carrying different weights in their mouths affected their walking and running. The researchers found that as the weight increased, the pressure on their forelimbs also increased, but the individual muscles didn't work harder in response to the added weight. This suggests that carrying heavier items in their mouths doesn't cause the common biceps tendon issues seen in these dogs. Understanding this can help owners and vets better address muscle and tendon problems in retrievers.

People also search for: retriever dog biceps tendon problems · why is my dog limping after carrying weight · retriever muscle function study

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of mouth weight on gait and relative function of forelimb muscles in retriever hunting dogs as a possible explanation for biceps tendinopathy. METHODS: Ten sound retriever dogs underwent acoustic myography, measuring efficiency (E-score), spatial summation (S-score), and temporal summation (T-score) during walk and trot on a pressure-sensitive walkway while carrying a 0 lb (0 kg), 1 lb (0.45 kg), and 3.2 lb (1.45 kg) mouth weight. Gait data included total pressure index (TPI), step length, and stance time. Statistics included a mixed effects model significant at< 0.05. RESULTS: Forelimb TPI increased with increasing weight. There was no significant change in individual muscle parameters in response to weight. Significance was found in between-muscle comparisons. For walk, T-score was significantly lower in triceps vs. brachiocephalicus with 1 lb, not with 3.2 lb., S-score was significantly lower in the biceps at 0, 1 lb, and triceps at 0 lb. when compared to brachiocephalicus, E-score was significantly lower in deltoideus vs. brachiocephalicus at trot with l and 3.2 lb. There was an overall significant effect of muscle on T-score at trot, but no individual muscle comparison was significant. CONCLUSION: Forelimb load increases with mouth weight. Deltoideus had a longer contraction time in response to increasing weight at trot when compared to brachiocephalicus. The biceps muscle did not show increased work in response to increasing weight. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The underlying etiology of biceps tendinopathies in retriever dogs remains uncertain but is not due to increasing weight.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36467659/