PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Use of antigen-specific interleukin-2 to differentiate between cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and cattle infected with M. bovis.

Journal:
Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI
Year:
2014
Authors:
Rhodes, Shelley G et al.
Affiliation:
TB Research Group · United Kingdom

Plain-English summary

This study looked at a new test to help tell the difference between cattle that have been vaccinated against a disease called bovine tuberculosis (caused by Mycobacterium bovis) and those that are actually infected with the bacteria. Researchers measured a specific immune response called interleukin-2 (IL-2) in blood samples from both vaccinated and infected cattle. They found that infected cattle produced measurable IL-2, while vaccinated cattle did not show this response, even after being exposed to the bacteria. This suggests that the IL-2 response may only happen after a real infection, which could help veterinarians identify infected cattle more accurately. However, the test isn't perfect and may miss some cases, especially in animals that don't show clear signs of infection.

Abstract

We describe here the application of a novel bovine interleukin-2 (IL-2) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the measurement of antigen-specific IL-2 in cattle naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis and in cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and then experimentally challenged with pathogenic M. bovis. Supernatants from whole-blood cultures stimulated with mycobacterial antigen (bovine purified protein derivative [PPDB] or the peptide cocktail ESAT6-CFP10) were assessed using a sandwich ELISA consisting of a new recombinant monoclonal fragment capture antibody and a commercially available polyclonal anti-bovine-IL-2. The production of IL-2 was compared to the production of gamma interferon (IFN-γ) in the same antigen-stimulated whole-blood supernatants. The data show that cattle infected with M. bovis produced quantifiable levels of antigen-specific IL-2, while IL-2 levels in cattle vaccinated with M. bovis BCG did not. Furthermore, cattle vaccinated with M. bovis BCG and then challenged with pathogenic M. bovis displayed a more rapid induction of IL-2 but ultimately had lower levels of infection-induced IL-2 than did unvaccinated challenge control cattle. These data suggest that IL-2 responses are not detectable post-BCG vaccination and that these responses may require infection with virulent M. bovis to develop. This may be useful to differentiate infected cattle from uninfected or BCG-vaccinated cattle, although the overall sensitivity is relatively low, particularly in single intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin (SICCT)-negative infected animals. Furthermore, the strength of the IL-2 response may correlate with pathology, which poses interesting questions on the immunobiology of bovine tuberculosis in contrast to human tuberculosis, which is discussed.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24173026/