PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Use of erythromycin and metoclopramide in hospitalized dogs

By Teo, Ee Fung et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2025·Western Australian Veterinary Emergency and Specialty (WAVES), Australia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Use of erythromycin and metoclopramide in hospitalized dogs: a multicenter historical cohort study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of hospitalized dogs with gastrointestinal issues, such as vomiting and regurgitation, were treated with prokinetic medications called metoclopramide and erythromycin to help their stomachs work better. Over time, the use of metoclopramide alone decreased, while more dogs were treated with erythromycin or a combination of both medications by 2023. The study found that different veterinary hospitals had varying practices in how they used these medications. More research is needed to confirm how effective and safe these treatments are for dogs with GI problems.

People also search for: dog vomiting treatment · metoclopramide for dogs · erythromycin for dog GI issues

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prokinetics are used to treat gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility in critically ill dogs but there have been no published studies characterizing their use. The objective of this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was to describe the use of the prokinetics erythromycin and metoclopramide in dogs hospitalized in two institutions. We hypothesized that there would be change over time and differences between institutions in the use of erythromycin and metoclopramide. METHODS: Dogs for inclusion were identified by fee code searches for injectable erythromycin and metoclopramide in the electronic medical record systems of The Animal Hospital at Murdoch University and Western Australian Veterinary Emergency and Specialty Hospital for the years 2018 and 2023. 75 cases from each hospital in each year were selected for inclusion from the search results using a formal randomization procedure to yield a total case number of 300. Data collected for each dog included signalment, diagnosis, reason(s) for starting prokinetics, the injectable prokinetic(s) used, frequency, and doses. Chi square or Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriate to compare the proportions of dogs receiving metoclopramide alone, erythromycin alone, or both prokinetics in 2018 and 2023, the proportions of dogs receiving metoclopramide or erythromycin as sole prokinetics between the two institutions, and the proportions of dogs receiving a single prokinetic versus dual prokinetics between the two institutions. RESULTS: Primary GI diseases accounted for the majority of the diagnoses. The most common reasons for starting a prokinetic were vomiting, an imaging diagnosis of ileus, prophylaxis following abdominal surgery, and regurgitation. Metoclopramide was administered as a sole prokinetic in the majority of dogs, fewer cases received erythromycin alone, or both prokinetics. Use of metoclopramide alone decreased from 2018 to 2023, with more dogs receiving erythromycin alone or both prokinetics in 2023. There were also significant differences in prokinetic use between institutions. DISCUSSION: Prospective studies to investigate the effectiveness and safety of metoclopramide and erythromycin as prokinetics in dogs are warranted.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40351772/