Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Double-pigtail stents help dogs with cancer blocking urine flow
By Berent, Allyson C et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2011·The Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Use of indwelling, double-pigtail stents for treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction in dogs: 12 cases (2006-2009).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 12 dogs with ureteral obstruction caused by cancer (specifically trigonal urothelial carcinoma) underwent a procedure to place special stents in their ureters to help relieve the blockage. The stents were successfully inserted in all but one dog, which needed a more invasive surgery to access the ureter. Most dogs were able to go home within a day after the procedure, and the stents remained open and functional for several months. This treatment was found to be safe and effective, helping to improve the dogs' quality of life by preventing further kidney damage.
People also search for: dog ureter obstruction treatment · ureteral stent for dog cancer · dog kidney blockage symptoms
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of minimally invasive ureteral stent placement for dogs with malignant ureteral obstructions. DESIGN-Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 12 dogs (15 ureters) with ureteral obstruction secondary to a trigonal urothelial carcinoma. PROCEDURES: In all patients, indwelling, double-pigtail ureteral stents were placed by means of percutaneous antegrade needle and guide wire access under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Stents were successfully placed in all patients. In 11 of 12 patients, percutaneous antegrade access was accomplished. One patient required access via laparotomy because percutaneous access could not be achieved. The median survival time from the date of diagnosis was 285 days (range, 10 to 1,571 days), with a median survival time of 57 days (range, 7 to 337 days) from the date of stent placement. Three complications occurred in 1 patient. Seven patients required concurrent urethral stent placement for relief of urethral obstruction. All animals were discharged from the hospital (median hospitalization time after stent placement, 18 hours [range, 4 hours to 7 days]) with an indwelling, double-pigtail ureteral stent (3 bilateral and 9 unilateral) in place. All stents evaluated 0.25 to 11 months after placement were considered patent. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Findings suggested that ureteral stent placement was safe, effective, and well tolerated in patients with malignant ureteral obstructions. Stents could be reliably placed in a minimally invasive manner and remain patent long-term. Ureteral stent placement should be considered as early as possible in patients with neoplasia, prior to the development of permanent renal damage.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21492045/