Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using dogs to track Lyme disease spread in Michigan ticks
By Hamer, Sarah A et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2009·Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Use of tick surveys and serosurveys to evaluate pet dogs as a sentinel species for emerging Lyme disease.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at whether dogs could help detect Lyme disease in Michigan by checking their blood for antibodies and testing ticks found on them. Out of 353 dogs tested, only 2 had antibodies against the Lyme disease bacteria, suggesting that dogs may not be the best way to track the disease's spread in areas with low tick populations. However, many ticks collected from these dogs were found to be infected with the bacteria. This means that while testing dogs' blood wasn't very effective, collecting ticks from them could help veterinarians identify Lyme disease risks in their area.
People also search for: dog Lyme disease symptoms · how to prevent ticks on dogs · Lyme disease treatment for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dogs as a sentinel species for emergence of Lyme disease in a region undergoing invasion by Ixodes scapularis. SAMPLE POPULATION: 353 serum samples and 78 ticks obtained from dogs brought to 18 veterinary clinics located in the lower peninsula of Michigan from July 15, 2005, through August 15, 2005. PROCEDURES: Serum samples were evaluated for specific antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi by use of 3 serologic assays. Ticks from dogs were subjected to PCR assays for detection of pathogens. RESULTS: Of 353 serum samples from dogs in 18 counties in 2005, only 2 (0.6%) contained western blot analysis-confirmed antibodies against B burgdorferi. Ten of 13 dogs with I scapularis were from clinics within or immediately adjacent to the known tick invasion zone. Six of 18 I scapularis and 12 of 60 noncompetent vector ticks were infected with B burgdorferi. No ticks were infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and 3 were infected with Babesia spp. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Serosurvey in dogs was found to be ineffective in tracking early invasion dynamics of I scapularis in this area. Tick chemoprophylaxis likely reduces serosurvey sensitivity in dogs. Ticks infected with B burgdorferi were more common and widely dispersed than seropositive dogs. In areas of low tick density, use of dogs as a source of ticks is preferable to serosurvey for surveillance of emerging Lyme disease. IMPACT FOR HUMAN MEDICINE: By retaining ticks from dogs for identification and pathogen testing, veterinarians can play an important role in early detection in areas with increasing risk of Lyme disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19119948/