Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using heart ultrasound to diagnose fluid in lungs from heart disease
By Hori, Yasutomo et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2020·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Usefulness of pericardial lung ultrasonography for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with heart disease were tested for breathing problems caused by fluid in the lungs, known as cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE). The researchers used a special ultrasound technique around the heart to look for signs of this condition. They found that dogs with CPE showed a specific pattern on the ultrasound, with four or more B lines indicating fluid in the lungs. This method was very accurate, helping to distinguish between dogs with and without CPE. Further studies are needed to see if this technique can also tell the difference between CPE and pneumonia.
People also search for: dog breathing problems · heart disease in dogs · ultrasound for dog lung fluid · cardiogenic pulmonary edema in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether lung ultrasonography (LUS) performed around the heart, where the lungs are in contact with the pericardium (ie, pericardial LUS), could be used for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD). ANIMALS: 15 control dogs with healthy hearts and 26 dogs with DMVD. PROCEDURES: In a prospective multicenter study design, dogs with DMVD were assigned to 2 groups: those with CPE (n = 11) and those without CPE (15). Thoracic radiography, echocardiography, and pericardial LUS were performed for all dogs. For pericardial LUS, the left ventricular short-axis view was obtained with a sector probe (dog positioned in right parasternal recumbency) and the number of B lines was recorded. Accuracy of pericardial LUS for the diagnosis of CPE was calculated, with thoracic radiography used as the reference standard. RESULTS: On thoracic radiography, all dogs with CPE had a diffuse distribution of interstitial to alveolar pulmonary infiltrates. On pericardial LUS, most control dogs (14/15) and dogs with DMVD but no CPE (13/15) had ≤ 2 B lines, whereas all dogs with DMVD and CPE had ≥ 3 B lines. The presence of ≥ 4 B lines had high sensitivity (91%; 95% confidence interval, 62% to 98%) and excellent specificity (100%; 95% confidence interval, 89% to 100%) for the diagnosis of CPE, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.99. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that identification of ≥ 4 B lines extending from the epicardium of the left ventricle into the lung field on pericardial LUS may be useful in the diagnosis of CPE in dogs with DMVD. Additional research is needed to determine whether pericardial LUS allows differentiation between CPE and pneumonia.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32101047/