PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Using glucose levels to detect septic belly infection in dogs

By Koenig, Amie & Verlander, Lindsey Lane·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2015·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Usefulness of whole blood, plasma, peritoneal fluid, and peritoneal fluid supernatant glucose concentrations obtained by a veterinary point-of-care glucometer to identify septic peritonitis in dogs with peritoneal effusion.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 39 dogs with fluid in their abdomen (peritoneal effusion) was evaluated to see if measuring glucose levels in their blood and abdominal fluid could help identify septic peritonitis, a serious infection. The results showed that while measuring glucose in whole blood wasn't very helpful, checking the glucose levels in peritoneal fluid was much better at detecting the infection. Specifically, a difference of 38 mg/dL or more in glucose levels between the plasma and peritoneal fluid indicated a higher likelihood of septic peritonitis. This method can help veterinarians make more accurate diagnoses in dogs with this condition.

People also search for: dog abdominal fluid infection · septic peritonitis in dogs · glucose test for dog peritoneal effusion

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of a veterinary point-of-care glucometer for identification of septic peritonitis in dogs with peritoneal effusion (PE). DESIGN: Prospective clinical evaluation. ANIMALS: 39 dogs with PE. PROCEDURES: Blood and peritoneal fluid convenience samples were collected concurrently in all dogs at the time of initial evaluation. A veterinary point-of-care glucometer was used to measure glucose concentration in heparinized whole blood, plasma, peritoneal fluid, and peritoneal fluid supernatant samples. Seventeen dogs had confirmed septic peritonitis, and 22 dogs had nonseptic PE. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of identification of dogs with septic peritonitis were calculated for glucose concentration differences for whole blood versus peritoneal fluid (WB-PF), plasma versus peritoneal fluid (P-PF), and plasma versus peritoneal fluid supernatant (P-PFS). RESULTS: With a cutoff of > 20 mg/dL, the glucose concentration difference for WB-PF was an insensitive indicator of septic peritonitis (sensitivity, 41.2%; specificity, 100%). In comparison, the glucose concentration differences for P-PF and P-PFS had a higher sensitivity for septic peritonitis (88.2% and 82.4%, respectively) but a lower specificity (80% and 77.8%, respectively). With a glucose concentration difference cutoff of ≥ 38 mg/dL, specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy of P-PF and P-PFS improved. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Determination of the glucose concentration difference for WB-PF with the veterinary point-of-care glucometer was not useful in identifying all dogs with septic peritonitis. A glucose concentration difference of ≥ 38 mg/dL for P-PF or P-PFS, however, supported an accurate diagnosis of septic peritonitis in dogs with PE.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26480011/