PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Inflammation after open vs laparoscopic spay surgery in dogs

By Espadas-González, Lorena et al.·Published in The Veterinary record·2023·Department of Animal Medicine, Spain·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Using complete blood count-derived inflammatory markers to compare postoperative inflammation in dogs undergoing open or laparoscopic ovariectomy.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of female dogs underwent either laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOV) or a traditional mini-celiotomy (COV) to remove their ovaries. After surgery, blood tests showed that inflammation levels peaked 6-8 hours post-operation, with higher inflammation noted in the LapOV group compared to the COV group. However, by 24 hours after surgery, both groups had similar inflammation levels. This suggests that while laparoscopic surgery may cause more immediate inflammation, both methods lead to similar recovery outcomes within a day.

People also search for: dog ovariectomy recovery · laparoscopic surgery inflammation in dogs · post-surgery care for female dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory response&#xa0;triggered in dogs after laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOV) or ovariectomy through mini-celiotomy (COV) has never been compared using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic inflammatory index (SII). METHODS: Bitches underwent LapOV (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;25) or COV (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;25). NLR, PLR and SII were calculated 1 hour before ovariectomy (T0) and 2-3, 6-8 and 20-24 hours (T1-T3) after surgery. RESULTS: Surgical time was longer in the LapOV group. Changes over time were observed in the NLR, PLR and SII in both groups (p < 0.001). PLR at baseline and T1 (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.03 and 0.01) and NLR, PLR and SII at T2 (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.01, 0.01 and 0.009) were higher in the LapOV group than in the COV group, but they did not differ at T3. LIMITATIONS: The overrepresentation of Greyhounds in the LapOV group and the short-term follow-up are the study's main limitations. CONCLUSION: Although an inflammatory peak was observed 6-8 hours after COV or LapOV, it was higher after the laparoscopy. However, there was no difference in the bitches' inflammatory status 24 hours after surgery.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37043624/