Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using 12-lead ECG to tell types of fast heartbeats in dogs
By Santilli, R A et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2008·Clinica Veterinaria Malpensa, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Utility of 12-lead electrocardiogram for differentiating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 23 dogs with fast heart rates were examined for a type of heart rhythm problem called supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The study found that different types of SVT could be identified using a special heart test called a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). For example, dogs with one type of SVT had faster heart rates and specific patterns on the ECG that differed from another type. This information can help veterinarians diagnose and treat heart issues in dogs more effectively.
People also search for: dog fast heart rate · dog heart rhythm problems · dog ECG results · how to treat dog SVT · signs of heart problems in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 12-lead surface ECG is validated for differentiating supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) in humans. Despite the description of SVT in veterinary medicine, no studies have analyzed the electrocardiographic features of this type of arrhythmias in dogs. OBJECTIVE: To describe the specific electrocardiographic criteria used to differentiate the most common SVT in dogs. ANIMALS: Twenty-three dogs examined at Clinica Veterinaria Malpensa for SVT with the mechanism documented by electrophysiologic studies (EPS). METHODS: Twelve-lead electrocardiographic variables obtained from 14 dogs with orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (OAVRT) and 9 dogs with focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) were compared. RESULTS: Dogs with FAT had faster heart rates (278 +/- 62 versus 229 +/- 42 bpm; P= .049) and less QRS alternans (33 versus 86%; P= .022). P waves appeared during tachycardia in 22 dogs, with a superior axis in 100% of OAVRT and 22% of FAT (P < .001). OAVRT was characterized by a shorter RP interval (85.0 +/- 16.8 versus 157.1 +/- 37.3 ms; P < .001) and smaller RP/PR ratio (0.60 +/- 0.18 versus 1.45 +/- 0.52; P < .001). Repolarization anomalies were present in 64% of OAVRT and no FAT (P < .001). Multivariate analysis identified QRS alternans and a positive P wave in aVR during tachycardia as independent predictors of arrhythmia type. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Electrocardiographic criteria used in people for differentiating SVT can also be applied in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18564226/