Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Are three abdominal X-ray views better than two for dogs with sudden
By Mavromatis, Marina V et al.·Published in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association·2018·Department Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Utility of two-view vs. three-view abdominal radiography in canines presenting with acute abdominal signs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A dog with sudden stomach pain was examined using two different types of X-rays to see if more views would help find the problem. In a study with 48 dogs, veterinarians looked at the images to check for specific issues and decide if surgery was needed. The results showed that taking three X-ray views didn’t provide any significant benefits over just two views when it came to diagnosing the issue. Therefore, for dogs showing signs of acute abdominal pain, sticking with the standard two-view X-ray is just as effective.
People also search for: dog stomach pain X-ray · acute abdomen in dogs · dog surgery need after X-ray
Abstract
There are clear differences in the normal radiographic appearance of the abdominal organs between a left lateral vs. a right lateral view. While a few veterinary academic institutions have transitioned to a three-view abdominal radiographic study protocol, obtaining only two views of the canine abdomen remains the current standard in veterinary medicine. In this combined retrospective and prospective, case-controlled study, 48 canine patients presenting with signs of acute abdomen were recruited. Four board-certified veterinary radiologists and four general practice veterinarians with greater than 3 years of experience in small animal practice were asked to determine if 10 predetermined findings were present within the set of images and if surgery was recommended based on those findings. Image readers were unaware of the clinical history. Three-view studies did not yield statistically significantly greater accuracy than two-view studies when evaluating all readers together. No statistically significant associations between the availability of the third view and increased accuracy or confidence were found in evaluations of general practitioners specifically. Evaluation of three-view radiographic examination, as compared to two-view examination, did not have perceived or statistically significantly increased diagnostic utility. Based on our findings, there is no statistically increased utility to justify a standard three-view abdominal radiographic examination over a two-view study for canines presenting with signs of acute abdomen.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29544019/