Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Accuracy of a new lipase test for diagnosing acute pancreatitis
By Graca, Roberta et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2005·Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Validation and diagnostic efficacy of a lipase assay using the substrate 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero glutaric acid-(6' methyl resorufin)-ester for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected of having acute pancreatitis (a painful inflammation of the pancreas) underwent testing to measure lipase levels, which can indicate this condition. Researchers compared two different tests: the new DGGR assay and the standard 1,2 DiG assay. The DGGR test showed a high sensitivity of 93%, meaning it was good at identifying dogs with pancreatitis, while the 1,2 DiG test had a sensitivity of only 60%. The DGGR assay may be a helpful tool for vets to screen for pancreatitis in dogs, providing a more reliable diagnosis.
People also search for: dog pancreatitis symptoms · dog lipase test results · how to treat pancreatitis in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased serum lipase activity has been used historically to support the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, a common disease in dogs. Most of the lipase assays that are currently in use lack optimum sensitivity and specificity. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to 1) validate the 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero-3-glutaric acid-(6'-methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) assay for determination of lipase activity in canine serum and 2) compare results, reference intervals, sensitivity, and specificity of the DGGR assay with a standard 1,2-diglyceride (1,2 DiG) assay for diagnosing acute pancreatitis in dogs. METHODS: Precision, linearity, and interference studies were performed for method validation on a Hitachi 911 analyzer. Lipase results from the DGGR and 1,2 DiG assays were compared by linear regression analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficacy were determined for both assays on a population of 30 dogs, 15 of which had acute pancreatitis based on history, clinical signs, and ultrasound findings. RESULTS: Within-run and within-day coefficients of variation (CVs) were low (<3%), with higher day-to-day CVs (< or =14 %). The assay was linear between 8 and 2792 U/L. No significant interference by hemolysis and lipemia was found. Poor correlation was found between the assays (r(s)=0.84). The lipase reference interval was 8-120 U/L for the DGGR assay and 30-699 U/L for the 1,2 DiG assay. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatitis were 93% and 53%, respectively, for the DGGR assay and 60% and 73% for the 1,2 DiG assay. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed similar areas under the curve. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this study, the DGGR method is considered adequate for assaying serum lipase activity in dogs. The high sensitivity of the DGGR assay suggests it may be a useful screening test for canine pancreatitis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15732016/