PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Accuracy of a new lipase test for diagnosing acute pancreatitis

By Graca, Roberta et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2005·Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Validation and diagnostic efficacy of a lipase assay using the substrate 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero glutaric acid-(6' methyl resorufin)-ester for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs suspected of having acute pancreatitis (a painful inflammation of the pancreas) underwent testing to measure lipase levels, which can indicate this condition. Researchers compared two different tests: the new DGGR assay and the standard 1,2 DiG assay. The DGGR test showed a high sensitivity of 93%, meaning it was good at identifying dogs with pancreatitis, while the 1,2 DiG test had a sensitivity of only 60%. The DGGR assay may be a helpful tool for vets to screen for pancreatitis in dogs, providing a more reliable diagnosis.

People also search for: dog pancreatitis symptoms · dog lipase test results · how to treat pancreatitis in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased serum lipase activity has been used historically to support the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, a common disease in dogs. Most of the lipase assays that are currently in use lack optimum sensitivity and specificity. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to 1) validate the 1,2-o-dilauryl-rac-glycero-3-glutaric acid-(6'-methylresorufin) ester (DGGR) assay for determination of lipase activity in canine serum and 2) compare results, reference intervals, sensitivity, and specificity of the DGGR assay with a standard 1,2-diglyceride (1,2 DiG) assay for diagnosing acute pancreatitis in dogs. METHODS: Precision, linearity, and interference studies were performed for method validation on a Hitachi 911 analyzer. Lipase results from the DGGR and 1,2 DiG assays were compared by linear regression analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficacy were determined for both assays on a population of 30 dogs, 15 of which had acute pancreatitis based on history, clinical signs, and ultrasound findings. RESULTS: Within-run and within-day coefficients of variation (CVs) were low (<3%), with higher day-to-day CVs (< or =14 %). The assay was linear between 8 and 2792 U/L. No significant interference by hemolysis and lipemia was found. Poor correlation was found between the assays (r(s)=0.84). The lipase reference interval was 8-120 U/L for the DGGR assay and 30-699 U/L for the 1,2 DiG assay. Sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatitis were 93% and 53%, respectively, for the DGGR assay and 60% and 73% for the 1,2 DiG assay. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed similar areas under the curve. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this study, the DGGR method is considered adequate for assaying serum lipase activity in dogs. The high sensitivity of the DGGR assay suggests it may be a useful screening test for canine pancreatitis.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15732016/