Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
New patch test method for house dust mite allergy in dogs
By Olivry, Thierry et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2012·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Validation of a novel epicutaneous delivery system for patch testing of house dust mite-hypersensitive dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of six Maltese-beagle mix dogs with allergies to house dust mites were tested using two different skin patch methods to see which one worked better for identifying their allergies. The new Viaskin patches caused stronger allergic reactions compared to the traditional Finn chamber patches, showing more inflammation and immune cell activity in the skin. This suggests that Viaskin patches could be a more effective way to test for allergies in dogs with skin issues like atopic dermatitis.
People also search for: dog skin allergy test · house dust mite allergy in dogs · atopic dermatitis treatment for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patch tests with allergens are used for the evaluation of cellular hypersensitivity to food and environmental allergens in dogs and humans with atopic dermatitis. Viaskin is a novel allergen epicutaneous delivery system that enhances epidermal allergen capture by immune cells. OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of Viaskin and Finn chamber patch tests in dogs hypersensitive to mite allergens. METHODS: Empty control or Dermatophagoides farinae house dust mite-containing Viaskin or Finn chamber patches were applied to the thoracic skin of six mite-hypersensitive Maltese-beagle crossbred atopic dogs. Lesions were graded 49 and 72 h after patch test application, and skin biopsies were collected after 72 h. Overall microscopic inflammation, eosinophil and T-lymphocyte infiltrations were scored. RESULTS: Positive macroscopic patch test reactions developed at five of six Viaskin application sites and four of six Finn chamber application sites. Median microscopic epidermal and dermal inflammation, as well as eosinophil and CD3 T-lymphocyte dermal scores were always higher in biopsies collected at Viaskin than at Finn chamber sites. Microscopic inflammation scores were significantly higher after mite allergen-containing Viaskin compared with empty patches, but this was not the case for mite-containing Finn chambers compared with control chambers. Scores obtained using Viaskin were not significantly different from those obtained using Finn chambers. Macroscopic and microscopic scores were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In mite-allergic dogs, Viaskin epicutaneous delivery systems appear to induce stronger allergen-specific inflammation than currently used Finn chamber patch tests. Consequently, Viaskin patches might offer a better alternative for screening cellular hypersensitivity to food and environmental allergens.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23050930/