PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Vascular ring anomalies causing regurgitation in young cats

By Bascuñán, Ana et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2020·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Vascular ring anomalies in cats: 20 cases (2000-2018).

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 20 cats with a condition called vascular ring anomalies (VRA) were studied, with most of them being under a year old. The most common symptom was regurgitation, which affected 90% of the cats. A surgical procedure was performed, and 90% of the cats survived the surgery. However, many of them continued to show signs of illness, with some still having issues like megaesophagus (a condition where the esophagus is enlarged) even months after the operation. Overall, while the surgery was successful in saving lives, some cats still faced ongoing health challenges.

People also search for: cat regurgitation causes · cat megaesophagus treatment · vascular ring anomalies in cats

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical characteristics, types of vascular ring anomalies (VRA), operative findings, complications, and survival after surgical treatment of cats with VRA. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, multi-institutional case series. ANIMALS: Client- or shelter-owned cats presenting to academic, referral veterinary institutions. METHODS: Medical records of cats with VRA that underwent surgical treatment were reviewed. Signalment, relevant medical history, clinical signs, diagnostic imaging, surgical findings, complications, and survival were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty cats with VRA were included. Vascular ring anomalies were most commonly (75% [15/20]) diagnosed in cats less than 1 year old, with no breed or sex predilection. Regurgitation was the most common clinical sign, present in 18 of 20 (90%) cats. A persistent right aortic arch was diagnosed in 17 of 20 (85%) cats, with concurrent aberrant left subclavian artery in four of the cats. Surgical treatment was associated with survival to discharge in 18 of 20 (90%) cats. Persistent clinical signs were reported in nine of 13 (69%) cats, and radiographic evidence of megaesophagus persisted in four of 13 (31%) cats, with a median follow-up of 275 days after discharge. CONCLUSION: Persistent right aortic arch was the most commonly diagnosed VRA in cats in this series, although multiple anomalies were observed. Surgical treatment of VRA in cats was associated with a high survival to discharge, although persistence of clinical signs and megaesophagus was noted in 69% and 31% of the cats, respectively. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Surgical treatment of VRA in cats is associated with a high survival rate; however, persistence of clinical signs is an expected outcome.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31598999/