PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Vector-borne infections found in healthy military working dogs

By Sonnberger, Bernhard W et al.·Published in Parasitology international·2021·Institute of Parasitology·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Vector-borne pathogens in clinically healthy military working dogs in eastern Austria.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of military working dogs in eastern Austria were tested for infections from parasites and bacteria that can be spread by ticks and mosquitoes. Out of 94 dogs, a few were found to have Dirofilaria (a type of heartworm) and Babesia (which can cause fever and anemia), while others showed antibodies for Lyme disease. This indicates that even healthy dogs can carry these infections, suggesting that current protective measures may not be enough. The findings highlight the need for better monitoring of these diseases in military working dogs to keep them safe.

People also search for: military working dog infections · dog tick disease prevention · symptoms of Babesia in dogs

Abstract

Military working dogs have an increased risk of acquiring an infection with vector-borne pathogens due to kennel housing and regular exposure to wildlife and vectors. To evaluate the level of infections in clinically healthy dogs of the Austrian Armed Forces, 94 individuals of the Military Working Dog Training Centre (MWDTC) Kaisersteinbruch/eastern Austria were examined in August 2016, February 2019 and August 2019. A modified Knott test was used to determine the presence of microfilariae, PCR for DNA detection of filarioid nematodes (incl. Dirofilaria), Leishmania spp., piroplasms, Borrelia spp., Bartonella spp. and Anaplasmataceae, and serological examination for antibodies against Borrelia burgdoferi s. l. and Leishmania infantum in all dogs. Two dogs were positive for Dirofilaria repens in the Knott test, and one of them also by PCR. Six clinically healthy dogs (4.2%) were positive for Babesia canis (PCR). In serology, 10 (10.6%) of the dogs were positive for specific antibodies against Borrelia burgdoferi s. l. The results suggest that the current measures against arthropod vector exposure and the pathogens they can transmit are not fully sufficient for these dogs. Further investigations of the tick and mosquito fauna in this area will shed more light on the risk of exposure for both the dogs and the staff of the MWDTC.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34166784/