PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Swallowing test finds breathing and eating tract problems in dogs

By Howard, Jennifer et al.Ā·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicineĀ·2023Ā·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed →

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Videofluoroscopic swallow study abnormalities identify aerodigestive disorders in dogs with respiratory disease versus healthy controls.

Species:
dog
Dog coughingBreathing & coughDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 45 dogs with respiratory issues were tested for swallowing problems using a special video study, and 75% of them showed abnormalities. This suggests that many dogs with breathing problems might also have issues with swallowing, even if they aren't showing signs like vomiting or choking. In contrast, only 13% of healthy dogs had these abnormalities. The study highlights the importance of checking for swallowing issues in dogs with respiratory diseases, as it can help identify additional health problems.

People also search for: dog respiratory disease swallowing problems Ā· why is my dog coughing Ā· dog aspiration pneumonia treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aerodigestive diseases (AeroD) pathologically link respiratory and alimentary tracts. Dogs with respiratory signs lacking dysphagia, vomiting, or regurgitation typically do not undergo diagnostic testing that identifies comorbid alimentary disease. A videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) identifies defects in swallowing, reflux, and aspiration. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that dogs with respiratory and no alimentary disease (RESP) would have significantly more abnormal VFSS metrics versus controls (CON). We hypothesized RESP dogs with pulmonary parenchymal disease would have more reflux and higher penetration-aspiration score (PAS) than those with airway disease. ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs: RESP (n = 45) and CON (n = 15) groups. METHODS: Prospectively, all dogs underwent VFSS. The RESP dogs had advanced respiratory diagnostic testing. Eight subjective and 3 objective VFSS metrics (pharyngeal constriction ratio [PCR], PAS, and esophageal transit time [ETT]) were assessed. Fisher's exact test compared differences between groups (presence or absence of VFSS abnormalities). The Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used to compare PCR and PAS. RESULTS: Subjective VFSS abnormalities were present in 34/45 (75%) RESP and 2/15 (13%) CON dogs, with RESP dogs significantly more likely to have VFSS abnormalities (P = .01). No difference in PCR was found between groups. Pathologic PAS was more common in RESP than CON dogs (P = .03). The RESP dogs with airway disease had higher PAS than CON dogs (P = .01) but not RESP dogs with parenchymal disease (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Most (75%) RESP dogs had VFSS abnormalities, emphasizing that AeroD are common. The VFSS has value in diagnostic evaluation of respiratory disease.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36951400/