PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Esophageal pH monitoring in dogs with reflux signs

By Kook, P H et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2014·Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Wireless ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring in dogs with clinical signs interpreted as gastroesophageal reflux.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 22 dogs showing signs of gastroesophageal reflux (GER), like vomiting or coughing, underwent a special test to measure acid levels in their esophagus. The results showed that while some dogs had increased acid exposure, there wasn't a strong link between their symptoms and the reflux events. Only a few dogs had mild esophagitis (inflammation of the esophagus), and overall, the connection between their clinical signs and the reflux was weak. This suggests that other factors might be causing their symptoms, and further studies are needed to explore this.

People also search for: dog vomiting treatment · why is my dog coughing · gastroesophageal reflux in dogs · dog esophagitis symptoms · dog acid reflux signs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although gastroesophageal reflux (GER) often is assumed to be causative for upper gastrointestinal and respiratory signs in dogs, no attempts have been made to verify this assumption. OBJECTIVES: To monitor esophageal pH with the Bravo pH system in healthy dogs and client-owned dogs displaying signs commonly attributed to GER. ANIMALS: Seven healthy and 22 client-owned dogs. METHODS: After routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy, radiotelemetric pH capsules were placed in distal esophagus for continuous pH recording. Reflux was defined as single pH measurement <4. At discharge, owners were instructed to press individually predefined clinical sign-buttons on the receiver whenever indicated. Results between groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: The median (range) number of refluxes in client-owned and healthy dogs, respectively, was 17 (1-205) and 10 (1-65), the number of refluxes >5 minutes in duration was 1 (0-14), and 1 (0-4), duration of longest reflux (min) was 10 (0-65) and 8 (0-27), and fractional time pH <4 (%) was 0.76% (0.01-6.28), and 0.3% (0-3.1). No differences were found between groups. The median of 7 (1-35) clinical sign-button pushes were recorded in 21 dogs. Median of 12.5% (2.8% [1/35]-50% [2/4]) reflux-positive clinical sign-button pushes was found in 10 dogs with reflux-positive pushes. Five (22.7%) dogs had increased esophageal acid exposure, and mild esophagitis was noted in 1 dog. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Despite evidence of increased GER in some dogs, the clinical sign-reflux association remained poor. Future investigation should focus on dogs with esophagitis.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25269696/