Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Wireless ECG monitoring for heart rhythm in dogs and cats
By Brložnik, M et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2019·Clinic for Small Animals·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Wireless body sensor for electrocardiographic monitoring in dogs and cats.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 36 dogs and 4 cats suspected of having heart rhythm problems were monitored using a new wireless electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor. This device allowed for longer recordings, which helped identify more arrhythmias in half of the animals compared to standard ECGs. The wireless sensor provided reliable data while the pets were resting or walking, but it wasn't effective during intense activity. Overall, this technology offers a promising way for vets to monitor heart health in pets over extended periods, leading to better diagnosis and treatment options.
People also search for: dog heart rhythm problems · cat arrhythmia monitoring · wireless ECG for pets · how to monitor dog heart rate at home
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of electrocardiogram data obtained by a wireless sensor from 36 dogs and four cats with suspected arrhythmias caused by cardiac or systemic diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wireless electrocardiographic recordings were obtained via two precordial electrodes attached to an electrocardiogram sensor connected to a smart device via low-power Bluetooth technology. Cardiac rate, rhythm and duration of P-QRS-T waves were evaluated with VisECG® software. Fifteen- to 30-minute wireless recordings were compared to standard electrocardiograms. Furthermore, the wireless sensor was used in 10 dogs and four cats for 24-hour continuous electrocardiogram monitoring at home. RESULTS: When compared to standard electrocardiogram, equivalent results were obtained for heart rate and duration of different waves. Due to the longer recording time, more arrhythmias were diagnosed with the wireless device in 50% (15 of 30) of animals with arrhythmias. Satisfactory recordings were obtained when the dogs were resting, standing or walking but interpretation of the wireless electrocardiogram signal was not possible during strenuous physical activity. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Wireless electrocardiographic monitoring is a reliable and accurate method for identification of heart rate, arrhythmia and duration of electrocardiogram waves. A higher diagnostic yield of arrhythmias was documented with the wireless sensor due to prolonged monitoring. The device offers a good option for the long-term monitoring of canine and feline cardiac rhythm.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30474218/