PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Immune response in dogs after vaccine with killed Ehrlichia canis

By Mahan, Sunita et al.·Published in The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research·2005·Faculty of Veterinary Medicine·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: A preliminary study to evaluate the immune responses induced by immunization of dogs with inactivated Ehrlichia canis organisms.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs was given a vaccine made from inactivated Ehrlichia canis, the bacteria that causes a serious infection called canine monocytic ehrlichiosis. The dogs showed strong immune responses after vaccination, which means their bodies were able to recognize and fight off the bacteria better. When these vaccinated dogs were later exposed to live Ehrlichia canis, they had a quick immune reaction, while unvaccinated dogs only showed a response after they got infected. This suggests that vaccinating dogs against this disease could be effective, but more research is needed to refine the vaccine and confirm it can prevent illness.

People also search for: dog ehrlichiosis vaccine · symptoms of Ehrlichia canis in dogs · how to prevent canine monocytic ehrlichiosis

Abstract

Ehrlichia canis is an intracellular pathogen that causes canine monocytic ehrlichiosis. Although the role of antibody responses cannot be discounted, control of this intracellular pathogen is expected to be by cell mediated immune responses. The immune responses in dogs immunized with inactivated E. canis organisms in combination with Quil A were evaluated. Immunization provoked strong humoral and cellular immune responses, which were demonstrable by Western blotting and lymphocyte proliferation assays. By Western blotting antibodies to several immunodominant E. canis proteins were detected in serum from immunized dogs and antibody titres increased after each immunization. The complement of immunogenic proteins recognized by the antisera were similar to those recognized in serum from infected dogs. Upon challenge with live E. canis, rapid anamnestic humoral responses were detected in the serum of immunized dogs and primary antibody responses were detected in the serum from control dogs. Following immunization, a lymphocyte proliferative response (cellular immunity) was detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNs) of immunized dogs upon stimulation with E. canis antigens. These responses were absent from non-immunized control dogs until after infection with live E. canis, when antigen specific-lymphocyte proliferation responses were also detected in the PBMNs of the control dogs. It can be thus concluded that immunization against canine monocytic ehrlichiosis may be feasible. However, the immunization regimen needs to be optimized and a detailed investigation needs to be done to determine if this regimen can prevent development of acute and chronic disease.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16137129/