Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Verapamil add-on treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy in dogs
By Jambroszyk, Melanie et al.·Published in Epilepsia·2011·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Germany·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Add-on treatment with verapamil in pharmacoresistant canine epilepsy.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
An 11-year-old Beagle with epilepsy that didn't respond to phenobarbital was treated with verapamil, a medication thought to help with seizure control. Unfortunately, instead of improving, the dog's seizures actually increased in frequency while on verapamil, leading to the treatment being stopped early for several dogs due to worsening conditions. Side effects like slow heart rate and low blood pressure were also noted, prompting a reduction in dosage. Overall, verapamil did not help with seizure control in these dogs and may have made things worse.
People also search for: dog epilepsy treatment options · Beagle seizures medication · why is my dog having more seizures
Abstract
PURPOSE: Verapamil add-on treatment has been suggested as a novel therapeutic concept for overcoming transporter-mediated pharmacoresistance. Efficacy data have been limited so far to case reports in individual epileptic patients. Therefore, we aimed to thoroughly evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of verapamil add-on treatment. METHODS: In a prestudy in healthy Beagle dogs the tolerability of verapamil add-on treatment was investigated. The efficacy of verapamil was then evaluated in 11 dogs with phenobarbital-resistant epilepsy. KEY FINDINGS: Verapamil add-on treatment (6.2-7.3 mg/kg) did not affect phenobarbital concentrations in plasma or cerebrospinal fluid. Side effects observed in healthy as well as in epileptic dogs comprised bradycardia and a decrease in blood pressure. Therefore, we had to limit the dosage to 1-1.5 mg/kg in the main study. In phenobarbital nonresponders, verapamil failed to improve seizure control. Verapamil treatment was discontinued prematurely in five animals due to worsening of seizure control or lack of an effect. In the remaining animals, seizure frequency tended to increase during the verapamil add-on phase, reaching a mean of two seizures per month compared to the pre-verapamil phase with phenobarbital monotherapy (mean of 1.4 seizures per month). In view of the detrimental effects in the majority of the dogs, the study had to be discontinued and no further animals were enrolled. SIGNIFICANCE: The failure of the maximum tolerated dosage to improve seizure control in dogs with phenobarbital-resistant epilepsy argues against the suitability of verapamil add-on treatment to overcome pharmacoresistance. Deterioration of seizure control in some individual animals suggests that verapamil might also exert unfavorable effects on seizure thresholds or its spread.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21219313/