Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Antibacterial prescribing patterns in small animal veterinary practice identified via SAVSNET: the small animal veterinary surveillance network
- Journal:
- Veterinary Record
- Year:
- 2011
- Authors:
- Radford, A. D. et al.
- Affiliation:
- University of Liverpool Institute of Infection and Global Health and School of Veterinary Science Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston South Wirral CH64 7TE UK · United Kingdom
Abstract
In this study, data from veterinary clinical records were collected via the small animal veterinary surveillance network (SAVSNET). Over a three‐month period, data were obtained from 22,859 consultations at 16 small animal practices in England and Wales: 69 per cent from dogs, 24 per cent from cats, 3 per cent from rabbits and 4 per cent from miscellaneous species. The proportion of consults where prescribing of antibacterials was identified was 35.1 per cent for dogs, 48.5 per cent for cats and 36.6 per cent for rabbits. Within this population, 76 per cent of antibacterials prescribed were β‐lactams, including the most common group of clavulanic acid‐potentiated amoxicillin making up 36 per cent of the antibacterials prescribed. Other classes included lincosamides (9 per cent), fluoroquinolones and quinolones (6 per cent) and nitroimidazoles (4 per cent). Vancomycin and teicoplanin (glycopeptide class), and imipenem and meropenem (β‐lactam class) prescribing was not identified. Prescribing behaviour varied between practices. For dogs and cats, the proportion of consults associated with the prescription of antibacterials ranged from 0.26 to 0.55 and 0.41 to 0.73, respectively.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d5062