PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How dog antibodies change with different leishmaniasis treatments

By Costa, Eliesse Pereira et al.·Published in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria·2025·Programa de P&#xf3·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Antibody dynamics in dogs submitted to different canine visceral leishmaniasis treatment protocols.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 21 dogs with canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL), a serious infection caused by parasites, were treated with different protocols to see which worked best. Some dogs received just allopurinol, while others got allopurinol with miltefosine, and a third group received all three treatments, including a vaccine. After a year, all dogs showed some improvement in their symptoms, but those in the group that received the vaccine had the best outcomes, with no relapses. The study highlights the importance of monitoring the immune response in these dogs to manage the disease effectively.

People also search for: dog leishmaniasis treatment · canine visceral leishmaniasis symptoms · allopurinol for dogs · dog vaccine for leishmaniasis

Abstract

This study evaluated dynamics of antibodies in dogs treated for canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL). Twenty-one dogs naturally infected by Leishmania spp. were grouped based on the treatment protocol: G1 (n=4) received allopurinol; G2 (n=10) allopurinol with miltefosine; and G3 (n=7) allopurinol, miltefosine and Leish-Tec® vaccine. The dogs were monitored monthly for a period of one year. To verify serum antibody titers, an indirect immunofluorescence reaction was performed. We found that dogs from G1 and G2 had lower clinical scores and antibody titers, when compared to the parameters evaluated in pre-treatment; however, clinical relapses were observed in three animals. In G3, clinical scores were lower than pre-treatment; however, they presented relatively stable antibody titers and no clinical relapse was observed. All animals submitted to the evaluated treatment protocols showed relative improvement in clinical signs. Furthermore, the immune response of animals must be considered, given the challenges of parasitic loads in infections. Therefore, it is necessary to complement the methods of clinical and therapeutic monitoring of dogs with CVL in order to establish the risk of transmissibility of the agent in infected and treated dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39813458/