PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Using conjunctival swabs and qPCR to detect leishmaniasis relapse

By Ceccarelli, Marcello et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2014·Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Application of qPCR in conjunctival swab samples for the evaluation of canine leishmaniasis in borderline cases or disease relapse and correlation with clinical parameters.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs suspected of having leishmaniasis (a disease caused by a parasite) underwent testing using conjunctival swabs, which are samples taken from the eye area, to see if this method could effectively detect the parasite. The results showed that this non-invasive technique was very effective, with a high rate of accuracy compared to traditional blood tests. The study found that certain blood parameters, like hemoglobin and globulins, were linked to positive test results. This method could be especially helpful for dogs with unclear symptoms or those suspected of having a relapse of the disease.

People also search for: dog leishmaniasis symptoms · conjunctival swab test for dogs · leishmaniasis treatment in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum, the dog acts as the main reservoir for the disease. Non-invasive sampling for Leishmania detection is pivotal for rapid and affordable diagnosis. Recently, the use of conjunctival swab (CS) has been evaluated as a non-invasive sampling technique for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). However, few investigations have been made on the applicability of CS qPCR in particular cases such as dogs with borderline IFAT titres, suspected disease relapse with comorbidity and therapy monitoring. The aims of this study were i) to confirm the efficacy of CS, comparing these samples to buffy coat (BC) samples, as effective non-invasive samples for Leishmania quantitative detection by qPCR and ii) to verify the usefulness of qPCR compared to conventional laboratory and clinical parameters to assist in therapeutic decision making regarding dogs with complex clinical cases. METHODS: Eighty dogs were divided into 4 groups based on their IFAT titres and clinical histories. Two qPCR assays were performed both on CS raw lysates and on purified DNA from BC samples. The assays were then compared. Z tests for difference of proportion, with Bonferroni correction, were carried out to evaluate the qPCR results. Logistic regression with backward stepwise elimination was performed to detect the subset of haematochemical variables significantly associated with PCR positivity. RESULTS: The qPCR performed on CS samples showed better sensitivity (87%) and specificity (96%) than assays carried out using BC samples, regardless of the primers used. The haematochemical parameters haemoglobin and globulins were found to be significantly associated with qPCR positivity. Pearson correlations between Leishmania kDNA load in CS and body condition scores or IFAT titres were calculated in dogs with new leishmaniasis diagnoses. The Leishmania kDNA load in CS correlated moderately with IFAT titres (R = 0.59) but a very weak correlation (R = 0.37) with body condition score (BCS) was found. CONCLUSIONS: The applicability of CS for Leishmania detection in dogs was confirmed, revealing the usefulness of raw lysates for quantitative purposes. Moreover, the qPCR was found to be particularly useful in cases lacking a clear clinical diagnosis, where the haematochemical values cannot be predictive.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25331737/