PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How multiple vector-borne infections affect disease signs in dogs

By De Tommasi, Anna Sara et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2013·Department of Veterinary Public Health, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Are vector-borne pathogen co-infections complicating the clinical presentation in dogs?

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Seven dogs were brought in with various symptoms due to co-infections from multiple tick-borne diseases, including Leishmania and Ehrlichia. These dogs showed a range of clinical signs that made diagnosis challenging, as the symptoms can overlap between different infections. The veterinarians used blood tests and bone marrow samples to help identify the infections and monitor treatment effectiveness. With appropriate care, these dogs received targeted treatments for their specific infections, which helped improve their health outcomes.

People also search for: dog tick-borne disease symptoms · Leishmania treatment in dogs · Ehrlichia infection in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection by two or more canine vector-borne disease (CVBD)-causing pathogens is common in subtropical and tropical regions where vectors are plentiful. Co-infections may potentiate disease pathogenesis, thereby altering clinical manifestations typically associated with singular infections. These factors complicate diagnosis, treatment and can adversely influence prognosis if the practitioner fails to suspect, document, and treat each concurrent infection. The spectrum of pathogens co-infecting dogs may change over time in a given practice location due to the rapid expansion of arthropods and their associated vectored agents, and international transit among pets and wild animals. This applies, for example, to Dirofilaria immitis and Leishmania infantum, the distributions of which have expanded from northern to southern Italy, and vice versa, respectively. Indeed, mixed infections by D. immitis and L. infantum have only been reported once in Italy, probably due to the fact that competent vectors for these infections do not usually occur in the same geographical areas. Thus, information that would help practitioners to identify clinical presentations in dogs co-infected by D. immitis and L. infantum and other CVBD-causing pathogens is scant. FINDINGS: This manuscript describes the clinical history and physical examination of findings for 7 CVBD co-infected dogs that were examined because of a spectrum of clinical signs. Five dogs were co-infected with L. infantum and Ehrlichia canis, one dog with L. infantum, E. canis and D. immitis and the remaining dog with L. infantum and D. immitis. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical signs and haematological abnormalities associated with the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of these dogs is discussed. Also, the usefulness of bone marrow specimens for the molecular diagnosis of CVBDs and for the enhanced monitoring of treatment response is emphasized.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23587324/