Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Ticks and fleas linked to leishmania antibodies in Brazilian dogs
By Paz, Gustavo F et al.·Published in Preventive veterinary medicine·2010·Laborató, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Association between the prevalence of infestation by Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Ctenocephalides felis felis and the presence of anti-Leishmania antibodies: A case-control study in dogs from a Brazilian endemic area.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study in Brazil found that dogs with fleas or ticks were more likely to test positive for Leishmania, a parasite that can cause serious health issues. Out of over 5,500 dogs tested, about 8% had antibodies indicating exposure to Leishmania. The research showed that 38.5% of dogs with ticks and 36.5% of dogs with fleas were seropositive, compared to lower rates in dogs without these pests. This suggests that fleas and ticks may play a role in spreading Leishmania among dogs. Pet owners should consider flea and tick prevention to help protect their pets from this disease.
People also search for: dog fleas and ticks Leishmania · how to prevent Leishmania in dogs · symptoms of Leishmania in dogs
Abstract
The association between the prevalence of infestation by Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Ctenocephalides felis felis and the presence of anti-Leishmania antibodies has been evaluated in dogs located in a city of Brazil endemic for canine visceral leishmaniasis. Blood samples from 5556 domestic dogs domiciliated in the urban area of Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais state) were submitted to enzyme linked immunosorbent (ELISA) and indirect immunofluorescent antibody (IFAT) assays, and 432 (7.8%) animals tested positive. Seropositive (n=200) and seronegative (n=200) dogs were randomly selected and examined for the presence of ticks and fleas, the results of which were expressed qualitatively as infested or non-infested, irrespective of the intensity of infestation. The prevalence of infestation by R. sanguineus was significantly greater (ρ=0.04) among seropositive dogs (38.5%) compared with their seronegative counterparts (29.0%). Similarly, the prevalence of infestation by C. felis felis was significantly greater (ρ<0.01) within the seropositive group (36.5%) than within the seronegative group (15.0%). Moreover, the probability of seropositivity for Leishmania was 53% higher in tick-infested dogs and 300% higher in flea-infested dogs in comparison with non-infested animals. Our data provide evidence of the vectorial capacity of these ectoparasites in transmitting Leishmania to the canine population, although further studies are needed to confirm or reject this hypothesis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20869131/