Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How cat poop collection and treatment affect Tritrichomonas test
By Hedgespeth, Barry A et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2020·Department of Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Association of fecal sample collection technique and treatment history with Tritrichomonas foetus polymerase chain reaction test results in 1717 cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A study involving 1,717 cats found that the method used to collect fecal samples can affect the accuracy of tests for Tritrichomonas foetus, a parasite that can cause gastrointestinal issues. Cats whose fecal samples were collected using a fecal loop had a higher chance of testing positive for the infection compared to those collected by colonic flush. Interestingly, the study showed that previous treatments with the medication ronidazole did not significantly impact the test results, and about 21% of cats treated with it still tested positive afterward. This suggests that while fecal loop collection may improve diagnosis, ronidazole may not be fully effective for all cats with this infection.
People also search for: cat diarrhea treatment · Tritrichomonas foetus in cats · ronidazole effectiveness in cats · how to collect cat fecal sample · cat gastrointestinal infection symptoms
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fecal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for Tritrichomonas foetus is considered the most sensitive means for diagnosis of infection but results could be influenced by fecal collection technique and prior use of antimicrobial drugs. OBJECTIVES: To establish any association between fecal collection technique or treatment history and results of fecal PCR testing for T. foetus. ANIMALS: Fecal samples from 1717 cats submitted by veterinarians between January 2012 and December 2017. METHODS: This study used a retrospective analysis. T. foetus PCR test results from 1808 fecal samples submitted for diagnostic testing were examined for their association with method of fecal collection and prior antimicrobial treatments. Data were collected from sample submission form. RESULTS: Positive T. foetus PCR test results were obtained for 274 (16%) cats. Fecal samples collected via fecal loop had increased probability of positive PCR test results (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.17, P = .002) compared to samples collected by colonic flush. There was no association between PCR test results and treatment history, treatment type, or prior treatment with ronidazole. After an initial positive PCR test, 4/19 (21%; 95% CI 2.7%-39.4%) cats treated with ronidazole had a second positive test result. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Results of this study support that fecal samples collected by loop might be better for PCR diagnosis of T. foetus infection. Lack of association of ronidazole with PCR test results and a 21% all-potential-causes failure rate of ronidazole in cats with preconfirmed infection are important limitations to use of this drug.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32039505/