PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Auranofin kills cat Tritrichomonas foetus in lab but not in infected

By Gookin, Jody L et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2024·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Auranofin is lethal against feline Tritrichomonas foetus in vitro but ineffective in cats with naturally occurring infection.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of cats with diarrhea caused by a parasite called Tritrichomonas foetus were treated with a gold compound called auranofin, which had shown promise in lab tests. Unfortunately, the treatment did not work in the cats with the infection, even though the levels of auranofin in their feces were high enough to kill the parasite in lab tests. While the cats experienced some minor side effects, the treatment ultimately failed to eliminate the infection. This highlights that just because a treatment works in a lab doesn't mean it will be effective in real-life situations.

People also search for: cat diarrhea treatment · Tritrichomonas foetus in cats · auranofin for cat parasites · cat parasite medication options

Abstract

Protozoal diarrhea caused by Tritrichomonas foetus (blagburni) is a prevalent, lifelong, and globally distributed burden in domestic cats. Treatment is limited to the use of 5-nitroimidazoles and treatment failure is common. The repurposed gold salt compound auranofin has killing activity against diverse protozoa in vitro but evidence of efficacy in naturally occurring protozoal infections is lacking. This exploratory study investigated the efficacy and safety of auranofin for treatment of cats with naturally occurring, 5-nitroimidazole-resistant, T. foetus infection. The minimum lethal concentration (MLC) of auranofin against 5 isolates of feline T. foetus was determined under aerobic conditions in vitro. Healthy cats and cats with T. foetus infection were treated with immediate release auranofin (range, 0.5-3 mg/cat for 7 days) or guar gum-coated auranofin capsules (0.5 or 3 mg/cat for 7 days). Adverse effects were monitored by clinical signs and clinicopathologic testing. Efficacy was determined by fecal consistency score, bowel movement frequency, and single-tube nested PCR of feces for T. foetus rDNA. Fecal samples were assayed for concentrations of auranofin, known and predicted metabolites of auranofin, gold containing molecules, and total gold content using HPLC, LC-MS, ion mobility-MS, and ICP-MS, respectively. Auranofin was effective at killing isolates of feline T. foetus at MLC ≥ 1 μg/ml. Treatment of cats with T. foetus infection with either immediate release auranofin or a colon-targeted guar gum-coated tablet of auranofin did not eradicate infection. Treatment failure occurred despite fecal concentrations of gold that met or exceeded the equivalent MLC of auranofin. Neither auranofin, known or predicted metabolites of auranofin, nor any gold-containing molecules >100 Da could be detected in fecal samples of treated cats. Adverse effects associated with auranofin treatment were common but minor. These studies identify that in vitro susceptibility test results of auranofin may not translate to treatment effectiveness in vivo even when achieving gold concentrations equivalent to the MLC of auranofin in the target environment. These studies further establish the absence of any predicted or unpredicted gold containing metabolites in feces after oral administration of auranofin.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39222580/