PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Canine visceral leishmaniasis signs and diagnosis in Brazil area

By Borges, Leandro Machado et al.Ā·Published in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)Ā·2021Ā·Secretaria Municipal de Sa&#xfaĀ·View original on PubMed →

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis in an Area of Sporadic Transmission in Brazil.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs in Brazil was tested for canine visceral leishmaniasis, a disease that can affect both dogs and humans. The tests used to diagnose the disease showed low sensitivity, meaning they often missed infected dogs, especially in areas where the disease is not common. Many dogs did not show the typical symptoms, making it hard for vets to identify the disease based on signs alone. However, one test, TR-DPP, was found to be reliable for confirming negative cases. This highlights the importance of being cautious with dogs that may have swollen lymph nodes, even if they don't show other symptoms.

People also search for: dog leishmaniasis symptoms Ā· swollen lymph nodes in dogs Ā· canine visceral leishmaniasis treatment

Abstract

Canine visceral leishmaniasis is a zoonotic disease caused by the protozoanin Latin America. Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) diagnosis in Brazil includes two serological tests according to the Ministry of Health (MH) protocol. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests, as well as clinical signs of VL, are usually reported in disease-endemic areas; however, it is known that local epidemiological factors can influence these results. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features, sensitivity, and specificity of TR-DPPand EIE-LVC in naturally infected dogs in a region of sporadic VL transmission to humans in Brazil. A total of 288 dogs were clinically evaluated and serological and parasitological (lymph node aspirates) samples were collected for VL diagnosis. TR-DPP and EIE-LVC showed poor sensitivity (0.62 and 0.44, respectively) to detect infected animals, compared with the direct parasitological examination, which is considered a gold standard method. Thus, the protocol of MH presented low sensitivity (0.42) to estimate prevalence and control measures in this region. TR-DPP presented a high negative predictive value (0.89), resulting in its indication as a confirmatory test in sporadic transmission areas. Classical clinical signs of VL were not frequently observed; therefore, clinical scoring systems might not be useful in this region. Veterinarians of nonendemic areas should be alert for asymptomatic dogs, especially those presenting lymph adenomegaly.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34030472/