Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Changes in dog saliva antibodies after short leishmaniosis treatment
By Cantos-Barreda, Ana et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2018·University of Murcia, Spain·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Changes in the concentration of anti-Leishmania antibodies in saliva of dogs with clinical leishmaniosis after short-term treatment.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 dogs diagnosed with leishmaniosis, a disease caused by a parasite, were treated with a combination of standard medication and allopurinol. After one month, most of the dogs showed a significant drop in specific antibodies in their saliva, which matched their clinical improvement. However, a couple of dogs had mixed results, with one not responding well to treatment even after an additional month. Overall, measuring these antibodies in saliva could help vets monitor treatment effectiveness for leishmaniosis in dogs, but more research is needed to confirm these findings.
People also search for: dog leishmaniosis treatment · leishmania antibodies in dog saliva · allopurinol for dogs with leishmaniosis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible changes in the concentration of anti-Leishmania antibodies in saliva samples from dogs with clinical leishmaniosis after short-term treatment. Twenty dogs with clinical signs and laboratory abnormalities compatible with canine leishmaniosis (CanL) were diagnosed and treated with a standard antimonial plus allopurinol therapy. The concentration of anti-Leishmania IgG2 and IgA antibodies in saliva was measured at the time of diagnosis (day 0) and after treatment (day 30) by time-resolved immunofluorometric assays (TR-IFMAs) and results were compared with those of serum. In addition, correlations between antibody concentrations in saliva and serum, clinical scores and selected laboratory analytes were calculated. TR-IFMA results were expressed as Units of Fluorometry for Leishmania (UFL). Most dogs that adequately responded to treatment (n = 17) showed a reduction of anti-Leishmania antibodies in saliva [median IgG2: from 678.0 (day 0) to 201.1 UFL (day 30), p < 0.0001; median IgA: from 91.3 (day 0) to 60.2 UFL (day 30), p < 0.01] in accordance with clinical improvement (p < 0.0001). However, two of these dogs showed an increase of anti-Leishmania antibodies in saliva. Among dogs that did not improve after one month of treatment (n = 3), two showed a reduction in serum and saliva antibodies. In these two dogs, clinical recovery was achieved after one additional month of treatment with allopurinol. The other dog that did not respond to treatment showed increases in the concentration of anti-Leishmania antibodies, both in saliva and serum, and did not adequately respond to an additional month of treatment with allopurinol. From this pilot study, it could be concluded that, despite the low number of dogs used, the measurement of anti-Leishmania IgG2 and IgA antibodies in saliva could have a potential use for treatment monitoring of CanL, provided that a sufficient amount of specific antibodies is present at diagnosis. This is because, especially in the case of IgG2, there is a high correlation between the saliva and serum concentrations, and the reduction of antibodies is generally in accordance with the clinical improvement. Further long-term studies with a larger population should be undertaken to confirm this potential.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29656998/