PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Best biopsy forceps size for intestinal disease in cats

By Bottero, Enrico et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2019·Poliambulatorio Argentina, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of 2 differently sized endoscopic biopsy forceps in the evaluation of intestinal disease in cats.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

Fifty cats with ongoing gastrointestinal issues were examined using two different sizes of biopsy tools during an endoscopy to check for conditions like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or intestinal lymphoma. The larger biopsy forceps (2.4 mm) provided better-quality samples than the smaller ones (1.8 mm), leading to more accurate diagnoses. This means that using larger tools can help veterinarians get clearer results when testing for intestinal diseases in cats.

People also search for: cat gastrointestinal problems · cat IBD diagnosis · cat intestinal lymphoma biopsy · endoscopy for cats · cat biopsy results

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, histopathological diagnosis of chronic intestinal disease is challenging because of difficulty in obtaining adequate duodenal samples. At present, no studies have investigated the influence of biopsy forceps size on sample quality in cats. OBJECTIVES: Duodenal biopsy using larger biopsy forceps (2.4 mm) will provide higher quality samples. ANIMALS: Fifty client-owned cats underwent endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract for evaluation of chronic gastrointestinal signs, with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or intestinal lymphoma as differential diagnoses. METHODS: For each cat, duodenal biopsy specimens were obtained using both small (1.8 mm) and large (2.4 mm) forceps and evaluated for adequacy, orientation, the presence of artifacts, villi morphology, the presence of inflammation, and neoplastic infiltration. RESULTS: The percentage of adequate and evaluable biopsy specimens obtained using the larger forceps was significantly higher than that collected using the smaller forceps. Agreement between the forceps was variable for histological features and substantial in the case of lymphoma. However, in case of disagreement, the proper diagnosis usually was achieved only with the larger biopsy forceps. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Use of a larger biopsy forceps allows collection of a higher percentage of adequate and evaluable biopsy specimens compared to the commonly used smaller forceps and indirectly decreases the percentage of artifacts and increases the percentage of samples with evaluable villi. The use of a larger forceps could be helpful to obtain high-quality samples and improve diagnostic accuracy.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30556184/