Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Accuracy of dog kidney blood tests by 2 analyzers and labs
By Halman, Christopher et al.Ā·Published in American journal of veterinary researchĀ·2025Ā·Veterinary Specialist Services, AustraliaĀ·View original on PubMed ā
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research ā every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work ā
Original publication title: Comparison of 2 point-of-care analyzers and the Eurolyser assay with an IDEXX reference laboratory method for measurement of symmetric dimethylarginine in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected of having kidney disease had their blood tested for a substance called symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) using two different point-of-care analyzers and two laboratory methods. The results showed that the two point-of-care analyzers, IDEXX Catalyst and Vcheck V200, provided results that were very similar to the reference laboratory results, while the Eurolyser method had some differences. Despite these variations, the findings suggest that the point-of-care tests can be useful for assessing kidney health in dogs. Overall, the study indicates that these tests can help veterinarians stage chronic kidney disease in dogs effectively.
People also search for: dog kidney disease testing Ā· SDMA test for dogs Ā· chronic kidney disease in dogs treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the concordance of 2 point-of-care (POC) analyzers and 2 reference laboratories (RLs) for serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) analysis in dogs. We hypothesized that the Vcheck V200 POC, IDEXX Catalyst POC, and Eurolyser assays would have an acceptable agreement with the IDEXX RL SDMA results. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted between August 2019 and March 2023. Blood collected from dogs treated at a referral hospital underwent SDMA analysis by 2 POC analyzers (IDEXX Catalyst and Vcheck V200) and 2 RL methods (Eurolyser and IDEXX). Dogs with suspected or known renal disease were preferentially included later in the study. RESULTS: 75 samples were included in the final analysis. There was a difference in SDMA results obtained from Eurolyser assays but not IDEXX Catalyst POC and Vcheck V200 POC assay compared to IDEXX RL results. When applied to the International Renal Interest Society chronic kidney disease staging classification, there was almost perfect agreement between Eurolyser and Vcheck V200 POC SDMA compared to IDEXX RL SDMA. CONCLUSIONS: While there was a strong to excellent correlation between assays, the results obtained via each assay demonstrated that there may be significant bias and analytical variation affecting the results. However, this may have minimal effect when applied clinically. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Analyzer and method-specific reference intervals should be established for SDMA analysis. There is preliminary evidence to support the use of Eurolyser and Vcheck V200 POC SDMA assays in the staging of canine chronic kidney disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases āOriginal publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39892400/