PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Carboplatin vs doxorubicin chemo after dog leg amputation for bone

By Selmic, L E et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2014·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of carboplatin and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy protocols in 470 dogs after amputation for treatment of appendicular osteosarcoma.

Species:
dog
OsteosarcomaMovement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 470 dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma (a type of bone cancer) underwent amputation followed by chemotherapy to see which treatment worked best. The study compared two main chemotherapy drugs: carboplatin and doxorubicin, using different treatment schedules. While all treatments had similar outcomes in terms of survival and disease-free time, dogs receiving the carboplatin protocol experienced fewer side effects. This suggests that carboplatin may help maintain a better quality of life during treatment, even though it didn't significantly improve survival rates compared to other protocols.

People also search for: dog osteosarcoma treatment · carboplatin side effects in dogs · doxorubicin for dog cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many chemotherapy protocols have been reported for treatment of canine appendicular osteosarcoma (OSA), but outcome comparisons in a single population are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of protocol and dose intensity (DI) on treatment outcomes for carboplatin and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy protocols. ANIMALS: Four hundred and seventy dogs with appendicular OSA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising consecutive dogs treated (1997-2012) with amputation followed by 1 of 5 chemotherapy protocols: carboplatin 300 mg/m(2) IV q21d for 4 or 6 cycles (CARBO6), doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) IV q14d or q21d for 5 cycles, and alternating carboplatin 300 mg/m(2) IV and doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) IV q21d for 3 cycles. Adverse events (AE) and DI were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare disease-free interval (DFI) and survival time (ST) among protocols. RESULTS: The overall median DFI and ST were 291 days and 284 days, respectively. A lower proportion of dogs prescribed CARBO6 experienced AEs compared to other protocols (48.4% versus 60.8-75.8%; P = .001). DI was not associated with development of metastases or death. After adjustment for baseline characteristics and prognostic factors, none of the protocols provided a significant reduction in risk of development of metastases or death. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Although choice of protocol did not result in significant differences in DFI or ST, the CARBO6 protocol resulted in a lower proportion of dogs experiencing AEs, which could be advantageous in maintaining high quality of life during treatment. DI was not a prognostic indicator in this study.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24512451/