PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Comparing CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 chemo for dog B-cell lymphoma

By Hawkes, Charles et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2024·The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of CHOP-19 and CHOP-25 for treatment of peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma in dogs: A European multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs diagnosed with peripheral nodal B-cell lymphoma (a type of cancer) were treated with two different chemotherapy protocols, CHOP-19 and CHOP-25, to see which worked better. The study involved over 500 dogs from various veterinary centers in Europe. Both treatments showed similar results in terms of how long the dogs lived without the cancer worsening and overall survival rates. This means that either chemotherapy protocol can be a good option for treating this type of lymphoma in dogs.

People also search for: dog lymphoma treatment · CHOP chemotherapy for dogs · B-cell lymphoma in dogs prognosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nodal B-cell lymphomas (PNBCL) represent the most common presentation of lymphomas in dogs. Multiagent CHOP (C = cyclophosphamide, H = hydroxydaunorubicin [Doxorubicin], O = Oncovin, P = prednisolone)-based chemotherapy protocols have been widely accepted as gold standard 1st-line treatment. CHOP-25 and CHOP-19 are most commonly prescribed but have never been directly compared. OBJECTIVES: Our primary aim was to compare outcomes of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL, treated using a 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25 protocol. A secondary objective was to determine the impact of protocol-related variables on outcomes. ANIMALS: Five hundred two dogs from 16 European oncology referral centers. One hundred fifty-five dogs were treated with CHOP-19 and 347 dogs with CHOP-25. METHODS: Retrospective, multicentric cohort study of dogs diagnosed with PNBCL between 2014 and 2021. RESULTS: The 6-month, 1-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2-65.0), 14.1% (95% CI, 9.4-21.0), and 196 days (95% CI, 176-233) with CHOP-19; and 56.4% (95% CI, 51.4-61.9), 17% (95% CI, 13.4-21.6), and 209 days (95% CI, 187-224) with CHOP-25. The 1-year, 2-year and median overall survival (OS) were 36.9% (95% CI, 29.7-46.0), 13.5% (95% CI, 8.6-21.1), and 302 days (95% CI, 249-338) with CHOP-19; and 42.8% (95% CI, 37.7-48.7), 15.4% (95% CI, 11.7-20.4), and 321 days (95% CI, 293-357) with CHOP-25. No significant difference in PFS and OS was found between the 2 protocols. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Our study confirmed similar outcomes for dogs with PNBCL treated with 1st-line CHOP-19 or CHOP-25. Both protocols therefore could be used as a standard of care in future trials.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39422460/