Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Which canine vaccines best protect puppies from parvovirus infection
By Larson, L. J. & Schultz, R. D.·Published in American Journal of Veterinary Research·1997·From the Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of selected canine vaccines for their ability to induce protective immunity against canine parvovirus infection
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 63 Beagle puppies, aged 5 to 6 weeks, were tested to see how well different vaccines could protect them from canine parvovirus (CPV) infection. Some vaccines worked well, providing immunity and preventing disease, while others failed, leading to infections and even deaths among the puppies. Fortunately, the vaccines that did not perform well have since been replaced with more effective options, ensuring better protection for puppies today. If you're considering vaccination for your puppy, it's important to discuss the latest vaccines with your veterinarian to ensure they receive the best protection.
People also search for: puppy parvovirus vaccine effectiveness · Beagle puppy vaccination · canine parvovirus prevention · best vaccines for puppies · why is my puppy getting sick after vaccination
Abstract
Abstract Objective To compare the ability of 6 commercially available multicomponent canine vaccines to stimulate antibody production in pups with variable amounts of maternally derived canine parvovirus (CPV) antibody and to induce protective immunity against challenge exposure. Animals Sixty-three 5- to 6-week-old Beagle pups with passively acquired CPV antibody titer between 1:20 and 1:320. Procedure 9 pups were assigned to each of 6 vaccine groups and 1 control group. Eight pups in each group were inoculated with vaccine or saline solution twice, with 3 weeks between administrations. The ninth pup served as an uninoculated contact control. Serum samples were obtained weekly and tested for CPV antibody by hemagglutination-inhibition assay. All pups were challenge exposed with virulent CPV-2a and CPV-2b at 14 to 15 weeks of age. Results 3 of the vaccines failed to provide protective immunity against challenge exposure because all pups in these groups became infected and most died. A fourth vaccine protected against death, but not infection and disease. Two of the 6 vaccines induced an immune response that was protective against infection and disease. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance Substantial differences existed among commercial vaccines available in 1994 in their ability to immunize pups with maternally derived CPV antibody. These differences caused many vaccinated pups to be susceptible to CPV disease for variable periods because some vaccines failed to immunize. Importantly, all 4 of the vaccines that performed poorly have recently been replaced by more effective products so that the 6 vaccines now perform similarly. (Am J Vet Res 1997;58: 360-363)
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.1997.58.04.360