PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Comparing two miltefosine doses with allopurinol for treating dog

By Iarussi, Fabrizio et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2020·Dipartimento Dell'Emergenza e dei Trapianti di Organi, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of Two Dosing Regimens of Miltefosine, Both in Combination With Allopurinol, on Clinical and Parasitological Findings of Dogs With Leishmaniosis: A Pilot Study.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with leishmaniosis (a parasitic disease) were treated with two different dosing plans of a medication called miltefosine, combined with allopurinol, to see which worked better and was easier on their stomachs. One group received a standard dose, while the other group started with a lower dose before increasing it. After 180 days, both groups showed improvement, but the second group had better results in reducing the parasite load and fewer side effects. Overall, the modified treatment plan appeared to be more effective and better tolerated, suggesting it could be a good option for future studies.

People also search for: dog leishmaniosis treatment · miltefosine side effects in dogs · allopurinol for dogs with leishmaniosis

Abstract

Miltefosine (MIL)-allopurinol combination therapy administered at standard dosage is effective to treat canine leishmaniosis, nevertheless for some dogs the digestive tolerance of MIL is not acceptable. This study evaluates an alternative therapeutic protocol by using a modified dosage of MIL to increase its effectiveness and improve the digestive tolerance. Thirty-fourowned naturally infected dogs were included and monitored for 180 days. The dogs were allocated in two randomized groups: Group X-18 dogs treated with MIL registered dose of 2 mg/kg, oral administration, once daily, for 28 days; Group Y-16 dogs treated with 1.2 mg/kg for 5 days followed by 2.5 mg/kg for 25 days. Both groups were also treated with allopurinol. Digestive tolerance was monitored by adverse events observation. Treatments effectiveness was evaluated by monitoring the reduction of clinical score, the improvement of clinicopathological abnormalities, the reduction of parasitological load by PCR and the number of relapses. 16.6% dogs of group X and 12.5% dogs of group Y showed treatment associated adverse events. The reduction of clinical score was 61.7% for group X and 71.6% for group Y. All dogs showed an improvement of laboratory parameters after treatment. Quantitative PCR showed better results in group Y compared to group X; relapses were only registered in four dogs of group X. The modified protocol demonstrates a better trend of results in term of tolerance, clinical effectiveness, parasitological load reduction and relapses control, suggesting it could be considered for new large-scale studies.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33381534/