PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Melphalan treatment outcomes and side effects in dogs

By Fernández, Ricardo & Chon, Esther·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2018·Department of Medical Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of two melphalan protocols and evaluation of outcome and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma in dogs.

Species:
dog
LymphomaDrinking & peeingDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 38 dogs diagnosed with multiple myeloma (a type of blood cancer) received either a daily dose or a pulse dose of melphalan, a common chemotherapy drug. Both treatment schedules were well tolerated and showed similar effectiveness, with dogs surviving an average of about 930 days after starting treatment. However, dogs with kidney disease or a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (a blood test result) had a poorer outlook. Overall, either melphalan treatment can be a good option for dogs with this condition, but certain health factors can affect their prognosis.

People also search for: dog multiple myeloma treatment · melphalan for dogs · dog cancer survival rate · kidney disease in dogs · neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) in dogs typically is treated with melphalan. A daily melphalan dosing schedule reportedly is well tolerated and associated with favorable outcome. Although anecdotally a pulse dose regimen has resulted in successful responses, little long-term outcome and safety data is available regarding this dosing regimen for dogs with MM. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare outcome and adverse event profiles between pulse dose and daily dose melphalan schedules and (2) to report prognostic factors in dogs with MM treated with melphalan. We hypothesized that both protocols would have similar outcomes and tolerability. ANIMALS: Thirty-eight client-owned dogs diagnosed with MM receiving pulse dose (n = 17) or daily dose (n = 21) melphalan. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study assessing outcome and adverse events in dogs receiving either protocol. Risk factors were evaluated for their prognostic relevance. RESULTS: Both regimens were well tolerated and similarly effective, with an overall median survival time of 930 days. Renal disease and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were negative prognostic factors, whereas hypercalcemia and osteolytic lesions were not prognostic factors in this study population. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Positive results support the use of either dosing regimen for the treatment of dogs with MM, and renal disease and NLR were negative prognostic factors. Prospective, controlled, and randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29566439/