Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
CT scans check blood vessel invasion in dog and cat chest tumors
By Scherrer, We et al.·Published in New Zealand veterinary journal·2008·Veterinary Surgical Associates, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Computed tomographic assessment of vascular invasion and resectability of mediastinal masses in dogs and a cat.
Plain-English summary
A 7-year-old dog and a cat were evaluated for masses in the chest area, which raised concerns about possible vascular invasion. A CT scan was performed to check for this issue, but it missed some cases where the tumors actually invaded nearby blood vessels. During surgery, it was found that 10 out of 26 masses had invaded major blood vessels, leading to a higher risk of complications and death for those pets. The study suggests that CT scans may not be the best way to assess these types of masses before surgery, and better methods should be explored to improve safety.
People also search for: dog chest mass treatment · cat mediastinal mass symptoms · CT scan for dog tumors · vascular invasion in pets · dog surgery risks
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the sensitivity of non-angiographic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to determine the presence of vascular invasion of cranial mediastinal masses in dogs and a cat, and to evaluate the association between vascular invasion and peri-operative mortality. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 25 dogs and one cat. CT scans were completed with slices ranging from 2 to 10 mm. CT images were evaluated by a board-certified radiologist blinded to previous diagnoses and surgical findings. Each CT study was evaluated for vascular invasion, defined as disruption of the vessel wall and extension of the mass into the vessel lumen. Data retrieved from the surgery reports included surgical approach, whether vascular invasion was present, the surgeon's decision on operability, and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Computed tomographic evaluation revealed 25/26 masses had no evidence of vascular invasion. During surgical exploration, 10/26 masses were found to invade major regional vasculature; the cranial vena cava (CVC) was the vessel most commonly invaded (7/10 animals), and 4/7 (57%) patients with invasion of the CVC were euthanised or died in the peri-operative period, from surgical or disease-related problems, which was significantly higher than patients without vascular invasion (p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Non-angiographic contrast-enhanced CT was significantly less sensitive for detecting vascular invasion of cranial mediastinal masses when compared with surgical evaluation. If the CVC was invaded by a tumour there was a significant risk of death peri-operatively when compared with non-invasive cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Due to the significantly higher mortality risk associated with invasion of the CVC, a more sensitive method than CT should be investigated to determine vascular invasion of mediastinal masses pre-operatively.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19043472/